2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The research team offered the participants a water management background and collected their feedback. More importantly, the team carried out the participatory procedure in a fair way via a two-way 20 communication process (Rowe andFrewer, 2004, Charnley andEngelbert, 2005;Zorrilla et Hydrol …”
Section: Public Participatory Process In Bn Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research team offered the participants a water management background and collected their feedback. More importantly, the team carried out the participatory procedure in a fair way via a two-way 20 communication process (Rowe andFrewer, 2004, Charnley andEngelbert, 2005;Zorrilla et Hydrol …”
Section: Public Participatory Process In Bn Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because although the cases of evaluation reviewed are numerous, certain important urban development projects/programmes (for example those considered largely profit-oriented and initiated monarchically) were not captured. Charnley and Engelbert (2005) state that written mail surveys were an effective and economical tool for obtaining feedback on the environmental protection community involvement programme. Their study disaggregated the citizen's understanding and satisfaction into four components: understanding of environmental and human health risks (associated with the studied site), satisfaction with information provided, opportunities for community input, and the agency's response to community input.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Public Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such practices may increase the community's trust in government, as well as their belief in the credibility of community health investigations and their acceptance of the results (Charnley & Engelbert, 2005).…”
Section: Increase State Agency Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%