2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40797-021-00170-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Public Support to the Investment Activities of Business Firms: A Multilevel Meta-Regression Analysis of Italian Studies

Abstract: We conduct an extensive meta-regression analysis of counterfactual programme evaluations from Italy, considering both published and grey literature on enterprise and innovation policies. We specify a multilevel model for the probability of finding positive effect estimates, also assessing correlation possibly induced by co-authorship networks. We find that the probability of positive effects is considerable, especially for weaker firms and outcomes that are directly targeted by public programmes. However, thes… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We aim to go beyond the traditional analyses focusing on average treatment effects of the policy as the latter does not take into consideration that the treatment is not equal for all the firms. In this respect, it is worth noting that while a growing literature has explored the effect of regional policies (Dimos and Pugh 2016;Caloffi et al, 2016;García-Quevedo 2004), only a handful of studies (Marino et al 2016;Dai and Cheng 2015) have tried to cope with a more fined grained analysis of the effects of regional R&D programs. Therefore, the evidence about the effect of an additional euro on R&D additionality is scant and the quest to expand our understanding of this theme is mounting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We aim to go beyond the traditional analyses focusing on average treatment effects of the policy as the latter does not take into consideration that the treatment is not equal for all the firms. In this respect, it is worth noting that while a growing literature has explored the effect of regional policies (Dimos and Pugh 2016;Caloffi et al, 2016;García-Quevedo 2004), only a handful of studies (Marino et al 2016;Dai and Cheng 2015) have tried to cope with a more fined grained analysis of the effects of regional R&D programs. Therefore, the evidence about the effect of an additional euro on R&D additionality is scant and the quest to expand our understanding of this theme is mounting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the effectiveness of public subsidies on private R&D spending, the number of scientific contributions has been growing in the last decades thanks to the development and refinement of methods for program evaluation in econometrics (Imbens and Wooldridge 2009;Imbens and Rubin 2015). This strand of research (David, Hall and Toole 2000;Garcia-Quevedo 2004;Caloffi et al, 2016;Dimos and Pugh 2016) seeks to determine whether subsidies prompt additional firms' investments in R&D, or they only substitute for investments that firms would have made anyway (infra-marginal projects).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%