2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2023.100989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating public transit agency responses to the Covid-19 pandemic in seven U.S. regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the limitations of Lorenz curve/Gini coefficient and needs-gap/transit desert approaches, we employ these methods and our proposed alternatives in an equity analysis of public transit service changes undertaken in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area during the initial response to the Covid-19 pandemic. We compare two points in time: February and June 2020, representing a high point prior to the pandemic and the lowest levels of service experienced prior to a gradual increase that proceeded through 2020 (Karner et al, 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To demonstrate the limitations of Lorenz curve/Gini coefficient and needs-gap/transit desert approaches, we employ these methods and our proposed alternatives in an equity analysis of public transit service changes undertaken in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area during the initial response to the Covid-19 pandemic. We compare two points in time: February and June 2020, representing a high point prior to the pandemic and the lowest levels of service experienced prior to a gradual increase that proceeded through 2020 (Karner et al, 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like many transit agencies worldwide, WMATA faced a significant ridership decline during the Covid-19 pandemic and adjusted its services accordingly. By April 2020, service intensity dropped by approximately half compared to pre-pandemic levels in February 2020 (Karner et al, 2023). Weekday ridership plummeted from 640,000 in February to 36,000 in April 2020 (Sablik, 2023).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason to exclude them from the analysis is that during the COVID-19 pandemic, changes in these factors were driven by the decline in ridership, which is the outcome variable in this study. Moreover, some transit providers kept service levels almost constant and did not make major service cuts like Chicago ( Karner et al, 2023 ) and Stockholm, Västra Götaland, and Skåne in Sweden ( Jenelius and Cebecauer, 2020 ). These regions also experienced major ridership declines that reached 60% (similar to other cities), which suggests that service cuts might not be a major contributor to the decline during the period of the analysis.…”
Section: Mediation Analysis For the Impact Of Covid-19 On Bus Ridershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isu kekerasan fisik [7], kesulitan dalam pembiayaan [8], dan keengganan masyarakat sebagai pengguna layanan [1]. Pada masa pandemi, angkutan umum semakin tenggelam karena masyarakat lebih memilih angkutan pribadi [9]. Jika tidak segera dicari jalan keluarnya, angkutan umum akan semakin sulit berkembang.…”
Section: Tinjauan Pustakaunclassified