2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating racial disparity in referral source and successful completion of substance abuse treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we removed all detoxification treatment episodes from the analysis as they are shorter and serve the purpose of stabilizing, not treating patients for substance use disorders. This approach is consistent with other studies that have removed detoxification episodes when evaluating factors associated with treatment completion in the TEDS (Saloner et al, 2014; Sahker et al, 2015). For the sake of completeness, sensitivity analyses were conducted including detoxification episodes and this had no effect on results of the analyses (results not shown).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, we removed all detoxification treatment episodes from the analysis as they are shorter and serve the purpose of stabilizing, not treating patients for substance use disorders. This approach is consistent with other studies that have removed detoxification episodes when evaluating factors associated with treatment completion in the TEDS (Saloner et al, 2014; Sahker et al, 2015). For the sake of completeness, sensitivity analyses were conducted including detoxification episodes and this had no effect on results of the analyses (results not shown).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Consequently, only records that indicate the individual had no prior SUD treatment were included in the analyses. Part of our previous work focuses on racial and ethnic minorities [11, 12, 23, 24]. It is known that racial and ethnic minorities vary in their treatment access and success levels [25–27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other comprehensive administrative datasets (Sahker et al, 2015;Alterman et al, 2001;Stahler et al, 2016), NDTMS has patient-level identifiers that enable cross-referencing with subsequent treatment admissions. This utility provides not only an objective summative measure of the sustainability of recovery in this population, it also enables national administrative systems to objectively capture whether patients had previously accessed treatment services, which is an important negative predictor of treatment outcome (Siguel and Spillane, 1978;Marsden et al, 2012).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%