2010
DOI: 10.1080/00927671003591367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Regional Environmental Governance in Northeast Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been acknowledged that regional cooperation can help to accomplish global mitigation objectives and it is easier for regions sharing common economic development structures, common cultural backgrounds or even geographical proximity to decide on mitigation policies or agreements [30][31][32] . Therefore, the global South countries tend to have closer bilateral cooperation with each other, which needs to strengthen regional cooperation to achieve collaborative emission reduction among South-South trade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been acknowledged that regional cooperation can help to accomplish global mitigation objectives and it is easier for regions sharing common economic development structures, common cultural backgrounds or even geographical proximity to decide on mitigation policies or agreements [30][31][32] . Therefore, the global South countries tend to have closer bilateral cooperation with each other, which needs to strengthen regional cooperation to achieve collaborative emission reduction among South-South trade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governance is supposed to touch upon two aspects, including subjects and norms (Müller 2009). Subjects exist in the living examples of construction-agent systems that represent the current situation of practices and the states of every stakeholder; norms exist in relevant institutional laws of construction-agent system projects, with the institution appearing to be an important factor or manifestation mode of governance that embodies the policy orientation and development trend of the constructionagent system (Torfing 2010;Saidel and Harlan 2010;Komori 2000). In view of this, the instances and laws of construction-agent system projects are selected as research samples.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different statuses (Pryke and Pearson 2006) and roles (Crawford and Helm 2009a) of stakeholders have led to the complexity of governance levels, which is the characteristic (Tasan-Kok 2010) of the project governance in which multiple independent subj ects participate; therefore, the governance subjects of construction-agent system are supposed to be divided into different levels. Governance is intended for the integration of individuals and collectives in a country, society and market (Torfing 2010), including government and non-governmental actors (Komori 2000). For this reason, the governance of construction-agent system projects needs to take into account the public and private actors (Pryke and Pearson 2006).…”
Section: Governance Subjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Korea, local-scale environmental actions were largely influenced and initiated by grassroots NGOs on behalf of political parties. In South Korea, environmental activism was suppressed by authoritarian regimes in the mid-1980s [50]. Despite the country's late start, NGOs in South Korea have become increasingly active in issues related to the promotion of the public welfare, such as the environment and other social issues [51].…”
Section: Drivers Of Local Energy Transition and Operative Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%