2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating research for disruptive innovation in the space sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Keller and Hüsig (2009) believed that disruptive innovation has the similar characteristics with the one proposed by Christensen as follows : (1) disruptive innovation allows products to have a new set of attributes; (2) disruptive innovative products do not meet expectations of mainstream customers in one or several existing attributes, therefore disruptive innovation only focuses on a niche market; (3) incumbents neglect the niche market due to the contrary innovation process or value with entrants; (4) the entrants further enhance innovation and improve attributes valued by mainstream customers; (5) incumbents lack the necessary competitiveness in innovation and they cannot provide new attributes, therefore they fail. Summerer (2012) mentioned that disruptive innovation often changes products or services in a way that the market does not expect, typically in a lower-price way or personalized customization for a group of customers, which usually has features that mainstream customers do not want initially, but these features were valued by marginal or new customers. Klenner et al (2013) mentioned that disruptive innovation brings a different combination of performances to the market.…”
Section: Review and Discussion Of Disruptive Innovation's Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keller and Hüsig (2009) believed that disruptive innovation has the similar characteristics with the one proposed by Christensen as follows : (1) disruptive innovation allows products to have a new set of attributes; (2) disruptive innovative products do not meet expectations of mainstream customers in one or several existing attributes, therefore disruptive innovation only focuses on a niche market; (3) incumbents neglect the niche market due to the contrary innovation process or value with entrants; (4) the entrants further enhance innovation and improve attributes valued by mainstream customers; (5) incumbents lack the necessary competitiveness in innovation and they cannot provide new attributes, therefore they fail. Summerer (2012) mentioned that disruptive innovation often changes products or services in a way that the market does not expect, typically in a lower-price way or personalized customization for a group of customers, which usually has features that mainstream customers do not want initially, but these features were valued by marginal or new customers. Klenner et al (2013) mentioned that disruptive innovation brings a different combination of performances to the market.…”
Section: Review and Discussion Of Disruptive Innovation's Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued that this situation might be dissipating in the aerospace sector, as it is prone to changes coming from radical and disruptive innovation. Therefore, Summerer (2012) intended to advance and stimulate discussion on the organization of disruptive innovation mechanisms specifically for the aerospace sector.…”
Section: The Theoretical Foundation Of Synergy Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Education (Christensen, Horn, & Johnson, 2008); • Medicine (Christensen, Grossman, & Hwang, 2009); • Military (Mitchell, 2009); • Gaming technology (Smith, 2007); • Information technology (Peterson, Anderson, Culler, & Roscoe, 2003); • Space (Summerer, 2009;Summerer, 2012;Veen, 2010).…”
Section: Theory Of Disruptive Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The space sector in respect to science missions has been characterized as a monopsony market in which the government is the main investor in space related technologies (Szajnfarber & Weigel, 2007;Summerer, 2012). It can be argues that the military has similar dynamics while to commercial market resemble more an Oligopolistic market structure.…”
Section: Space Sector Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation