Evaluating Risk Communication: Narrative vs. Technical Presentations of Information About Radon

Abstract

This paper reports on an experiment to test the hypothesis that people respond better to risk communication that reflects more closely the conditions of their social and cultural lives. The experiment used the case of radon to determine whether technical or narrative forms of risk communication were more effective at drawing people's attention, imparting information, and modifying behavior. Two series of articles on radon were placed in the local newspapers of two Massachusetts communities. Homeowner attitudes, knowledge, and responses were monitored in baseline and follow-up telephone surveys. A third community was selected for comparison. The newspaper series were developed on the basis of previous research and six focus groups conducted with homeowners. The technical series presented authoritative, factual risk information, in the scientific style of the passive voice with generalized and impersonal language. The narrative series consisted of dramatized accounts of individuals making decisions about radon testing and mitigation, written in a more personal style. The findings from the focus groups confirm the results of previous studies, but the small size of the follow-up samples was a limiting factor in drawing definitive conclusions about the relative effectiveness of the two formats. The experiment demonstrates the difficulty of any risk communication effort on radon and underscores the need for good research design.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information

“…For example, anecdotal evidence suggests that the intense images and theme music from the movie Jaws (1975) continue to affect people's intuitive assessments of the risk of shark attacks. Several other studies have addressed the power of images, versus verbal or other information formats, in eliciting affective responses (e.g., Golding et al, 1992;Loewenstein, 1996;Slovic et al, 1998;Jenkins-Smith, 2001;Leiserowitz, 2006), yet this is not the place for an extensive review of that literature.…”

Implementation of a radon measurement protocol and its communication plan by child care centre managers in Québec

“…It would also provide an opportunity to incorporate narrative messages (such as testimonies of participants in this study), which hold people's attention more effectively and more easily address the concerns of people compared to a technical paper mainly based on scientific facts. 27 In this intervention, however, parents or educators did not raise concerns about this issue.…”

A comunicação de riscos no mundo corporativo e o conteúdo da mensagem

“…), indicando a representação do perigo de uma forma geral como comunicação de macro riscos, enquanto denomina comunicação de micro riscos aquela que indica quanto esse "problema" é relevante para aquele indivíduo. Completando essa informação e considerando o formato técnico como mais próximo de números e tabelas e o narrativo como descrição verbal do mesmo problema, Golding et al (1992) demonstraram que uma reportagem que tratava dos perigos do gás Radon com informações apresentadas de forma técnica (dados téc-nicos, estatísticas etc.) era mais atrativa para os leitores de um jornal diário do que uma versão narrativa da mesma estória (contendo fatos pitorescos, entrevistas etc.).…”