2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2011.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating RNA Preparation Options for Archived Myocardial Biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, few similar systematic analyses have been performed on other cardiovascular clinical tissue sample types. Ip et al compared an organic extraction method with a solid-phase extraction method on archived right atrial appendage samples,[50] however these samples are different in size and composition from the more clinically-relevant left ventricular biopsies obtained in the ARCADIA study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, few similar systematic analyses have been performed on other cardiovascular clinical tissue sample types. Ip et al compared an organic extraction method with a solid-phase extraction method on archived right atrial appendage samples,[50] however these samples are different in size and composition from the more clinically-relevant left ventricular biopsies obtained in the ARCADIA study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dividing the muscle after dissection to source different applications is the best option in many cases. However, the muscle pieces are often too small to use pulverization under liquid nitrogen or mechanical grinding techniques for homogenization [2][3][4][5] . As muscle is a highly structural tissue packed with extracellular matrix and contractile proteins, inadequate mechanical homogenization leads to a low yield of subsequent DNA, RNA or protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%