Evaluating Scholarly Performance: The Productivity of Graduates of Social Work Doctoral Programs

Green, Robert G.; Hutchison, Elizabeth D.; Sar, Bibhuti K.

doi:10.1086/603932

Cited by 46 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Graduates of social work doctoral programmes in the United States, for example, were found to have low levels of scholarly productivity (Green, Hutchison, and Sra 1992). Green, Hutchison and Sras' cross-sectional survey canvassed a majority of social work graduates from American colleges and universities during a 28-year period, using a variety of measures of scholarly productivity to broaden more limited indicators employed in previous studies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rethinking doctoral publication practices: writing from and beyond the thesis

Kamler

2008

Studies in Higher Education

271

199

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rethinking doctoral publication practices: writing from and beyond the thesis

Kamler

2008

Studies in Higher Education

271

199

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Second, the research by Green, Hutchison, and Sar (1992) Pardeck, 1992). The inclusion of these journals directly replicates the journals assessed in earlier research by Lindsey (1978) and Pardeck (1992) and provides for a quantitative appraisal of any changes in the patterns of scholarly citations of manuscript reviewers over time.…”

mentioning

confidence: 89%

“…This resource abstracts every article from the major and minor journals in the field of social work and also includes journals outside the field. It is critical to include journals outside the field because Green, Hutchison, and Sar (1992) Table 3 clearly show that the editorial boards and guest reviewers in this study generally had low levels of scholarly productivity as reflected through numbers of articles published. Important conclusions can be made about the scholarly productivity of social work editorial boards as measured through citation counts and numbers of articles published.…”

Section: Publication Countsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Examination of the Scholarly Productivity of Social Work Journal Editorial Board Members and Guest Reviewers

Pardeck

Chung

Murphy

1995

Research on Social Work Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Limited research has been conducted on the scholarly productivity of the members of social work journal editorial boards (e.g., Lindsey, 1978;Pardeck, 1992;Pardeck et al., 1991). Lindsey was the first researcher to conduct a thorough empirical analysis of the scholarly achievements of social work editorial boards. He employed a number of measures in his research, including how often editorial board members were cited by others and the number of articles they had published. Lindsey concluded that social work editorial board members often lack a record of scholarly production and achievement. His findings for the related disciplines of psychology and sociology were much different. The editorial board members from these

show abstract

“…Although both supervisors and supervisees often invest a lot in this process, it is not known how effective this provision actually is in enhancing advanced practice skills. It is only fair to add, however, that, except for a few studies of post-doctoral degree publication rates (e. g., Green et al 1992;Tucker 2008), we don't know much about the outcomes of doctoral education in social work either.…”

Section: Other Underlying Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%