Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2851581.2892454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Severity Rating Scales for Heuristic Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is done by comparing the usability of the mobile local cultural apps between the preferences of students and academics for three Malay cultural mobile apps. Heuristic evaluation questionnaires were employed to compare the experience of different users when using the software (Alotaibi, 2013;Herr, Baumgartner, and Gross, 2016;Othman, Mahudin, Ahaguk, and Rahman, 2014). Three Malaysian mLearning apps were selected for the assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done by comparing the usability of the mobile local cultural apps between the preferences of students and academics for three Malay cultural mobile apps. Heuristic evaluation questionnaires were employed to compare the experience of different users when using the software (Alotaibi, 2013;Herr, Baumgartner, and Gross, 2016;Othman, Mahudin, Ahaguk, and Rahman, 2014). Three Malaysian mLearning apps were selected for the assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collection using the heuristic evaluation method is usually carried out by several evaluators who are competent in the field of interface development [9]. In this study, the data collection process will be carried out by evaluators who are experts in the UI/UX field.…”
Section: Initial Interface Evaluation According To Heuristic Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, Heuristic Evaluation was used to maximize the user experience of the application related to how to find errors from various user points of view by heuristic principles. There are ten heuristic principles used as parameters in measuring the usability of a system, namely Visibility of System Status, Match between System and The Real World, User Control and Freedom, Consistency and Standards, Error Prevention, Recognition rather than Recall, Flexibility and Efficiency of Use, Aesthetic and Minimalist Design Help Users Recognize, Diagnose and Recover from Errors, and Help and Documentation [9]. Using usability as a criterion for distinguishing usability from heuristics requires an understanding that usability refers to the ability of a product to be used by a minimally skilled user and that it can be projected during the creation of a product and evaluated by specialists and potential users through inspections and tests [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waktu pengujian tidak bersamaan, evaluator memberikan pendapat dan masukan pada observer, lalu observer mendokumentasikan kedalam sebuah form bersama dengan severity rate yang ditentukan oleh evaluator di setiap aspek penilaian. Severity rate adalah tujuan kedua dari pengujian heuristic setelah menemukan semua masalah usability, lalu mengukur tingkat keparahan masalah tersebut [13].…”
Section: A Metode Penelitianunclassified