Evaluating Smartphone Accuracy for RSSI Measurements

Abstract

Smartphones are today affordable devices, capable of embedding a large variety of sensors such as magnetometers or orientation sensors, but also the hardware needed to connect them to most wireless communication technologies such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or cellular networks. Therefore, they are handy devices able to perform Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) measurements for a wide variety of applications such as cellular coverage maps, indoor localization, or proximity tracking. However, to the best of our knowledge, the accuracy of such measurements has never been rigorously assessed. The goal of this paper is to assess the accuracy of the RSSI measurements made with a Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) smartphone in a variety of conditions, and how possible inaccuracies can be corrected. We primarily focus on the LTE RSSI, but we also extend our results to the Bluetooth RSSI. In this paper, we build a controlled experimental setup based on commodity hardware and on open-source software. We evaluate the granularity and limitations of the Android API that returns the RSSI. We explore how reliable the measurements in a controlled environment with a monopolarized antenna are. We show that the orientation of the smartphone, the position or orientation of the source, and the transmission power have a significant impact on the accuracy of the measurements. We introduce several correction techniques based on radiation matrix manipulations and on machine learning in order to improve measurement accuracy to less than 5 dBm RMSE, as compared to a professional equipment. We also explore the reliability of measurements made in an outdoor realistic environment. We show that whereas transmission diversity available in LTE base stations significantly improves the measured RSSI regardless of the smartphone orientation, the Bluetooth RSSI remains largely sensitive to the smartphone orientation.

Toward the Optimal Antenna-Based Wireless Sensing Strategy: An Ice Sensing Case Study

“…Should the co-located antenna act as a transmitter, it is expected that the sensor's response will be maintained and will still be detectable by the reader, as the sensor will have its own unique ID. The observed sensory response, both in the presence and absence of the co-located antenna, falls within the RSSI accuracy of smartphones [45], which shows that the proposed sensor could be adopted in future wireless networks.…”

Multimodal Indoor Localization: Fusion Possibilities of Ultrasonic and Bluetooth Low-Energy Data

“…c) Other Topics: A study on the RSSI measurement accuracy of different smartphones was presented by Boussad et al [25]. Lee and Lin propose a localization system based in the variations of measurable RSS values, to track the entering and exiting of persons in rooms [26].…”

Instruments to measure environmental and personal radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures: an update

“…The data were used to compare a range of variables (e.g., number of calls, duration of calls, laterality of phone use, hands-free phone use-wired headset, Bluetooth, speaker mode) with the tool and those collected through self-reported questionnaire after 6-months [30]. Similarly, another study collected weekly data on number of calls, duration of calls (minutes) and data usage (megabytes) Two large international studies-Mobi-Expo study [32]; COSMOS study [33] Quanta Monitor™ (Finland) [19] Cumulative and instantaneous parameters, including received power and transmitted power A pilot study in Australia [19] QualiPoc ElectroSmart™ (France) [22] RSSI (dB) from cellular antennas (2G, 3G, and 4G), Wi-Fi access points and Bluetooth devices, Positioning System (GPS) coordinate and the orientation of the smartphone Two studies from France [36][37][38] Wi-Fi Radiation Meter™ (Cyprus) [23] Power density (W/m 2 or dBm) from Wi-Fi access points A Croatian study [24] Crowdsourcing-Based EMF Exposure Monitoring App (Germany) [25,26] RSRP measurements (dB) of LTE networks, GPS coordinates, timestamps…”