Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3313831.3376406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Smartwatch-based Sound Feedback for Deaf and Hard-of-hearing Users Across Contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, recent studies with high-end sensory devices typically have sample sizes with less than 50 participants (N = 19, M = 20.15, SD = 10.61) due to natural budget constraints. In addition to their usage in the ESM context, these devices are emerging as convenient and applicable tools for data collection and intervention in other domains such as in health (see [47][48][49][50]) and in cyber security (see [44,51]) as well.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, recent studies with high-end sensory devices typically have sample sizes with less than 50 participants (N = 19, M = 20.15, SD = 10.61) due to natural budget constraints. In addition to their usage in the ESM context, these devices are emerging as convenient and applicable tools for data collection and intervention in other domains such as in health (see [47][48][49][50]) and in cyber security (see [44,51]) as well.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While accounting for the diverse perspectives of DHH people, prior work also highlights several general preferences among DHH users. Overall, the most desired sound characteristic is identity, which users prioritize when compared to other characteristics like volume or duration [8,22,27,54]. When discussing sounds of interest, DHH users generally rank awareness of urgent sounds (e.g., safety-related alarms, sirens) as most important, followed by sounds that indicate others' presence (e.g., door knocks, footsteps) and appliance alerts (e.g., oven timers, pop-up toasters) [8,22,54,67].…”
Section: Diversity Of Sound Awareness Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When discussing sounds of interest, DHH users generally rank awareness of urgent sounds (e.g., safety-related alarms, sirens) as most important, followed by sounds that indicate others' presence (e.g., door knocks, footsteps) and appliance alerts (e.g., oven timers, pop-up toasters) [8,22,54,67]. Additionally, the relevance of sound information may change as the user moves between social contexts (e.g., family vs. strangers) [8,22,36] and physical locations (e.g., at home vs. while mobile) [27,54]. For example, in the home, sound identity may be adequate [37], while directional indicators are important when mobile [27].…”
Section: Diversity Of Sound Awareness Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations