2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating solutions to overcome humanitarian supply chain management barriers: A hybrid fuzzy SWARA – Fuzzy WASPAS approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
58
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
8
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the most appropriate tool for making high-level decisions (Zavadskas et al 2018 ). The other related studies include (Singh and Modgil 2020 ; Prajapati et al 2019a , b ; Karuppiah et al 2021 ; Gupta and Soni 2021 ; Agarwal et al 2020 ), and many other researchers used the SWARA approach for the supply chain area. Experts play a critical part in the method’s measurement and calculation of weights and measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is the most appropriate tool for making high-level decisions (Zavadskas et al 2018 ). The other related studies include (Singh and Modgil 2020 ; Prajapati et al 2019a , b ; Karuppiah et al 2021 ; Gupta and Soni 2021 ; Agarwal et al 2020 ), and many other researchers used the SWARA approach for the supply chain area. Experts play a critical part in the method’s measurement and calculation of weights and measures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gupta and Soni ( 2021 ) used the data of just 6 experts in their study. Finally, the study of Agarwal et al 2020 used the data of just 7 experts. Thus, compared with these recent studies, we used the data of 18 experts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mangla proposed 20 solutions to 29 obstacles faced by humanitarian supply chain management. These solutions include long-term strategic planning, coordination among actors, and logistics management [21]. Dubey used a structural equation model based on variance to conclude that information integration and collaboration positively impacted the agility of the humanitarian supply chain [40].…”
Section: Review Of Existing Humanitarian Supply Chain Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humanitarian supply chain resilience in flood events is a complex issue. Its formation is the result of a combination of pre-assessment [21], diverse actors [22], strategic management [23], responsiveness [24], risk management [25], and material support [26].…”
Section: Identification Of Criteria and Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For organizations that seek longterm resilience of reverse supply chains, social and environmental concerns are considered sustainability factors [20][21][22]. Regarding methodologies, numerous evaluation models based on MCDM techniques for outsourcing 3PRLP have been introduced ranging from analytical hierarchy process (AHP) [23][24][25][26][27], fuzzy AHP [28,29], analytic network process (ANP) [30][31][32], fuzzy ANP [33], technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) [19,27,34,35], fuzzy TOPSIS [36], visekriterijumska optimizacija i kompromisno resenje (VIKOR) method [19,31,33,37], step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) [38,39], quality function deployment (QFD) model [28,40], data envelopment analysis (DEA) [26,35,41,42], other MCDM methods [30][31][32][33][34]38,39,43], exact methods (mathematical programming) [26,37,[43][44][45], and...…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%