2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2009.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating strength of thermally sprayed Al2O3 on aluminum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat transfer coefficient on the scale surface was assumed to be 1 100 W/m 2 K, and the thermal conductivity in the scale layer was assumed to be constant regardless of the temperature and scale thickness. The calculated thermal conductivity of the artificial scale layer of Al 2 O 3 was 1.4 W/mK, which was much smaller than the 32 W/mK value of a sintered body, 11) but slightly close to the 3 W/mK of a thermal spraying layer. 12) Takeuchi et al 12) stated that the binding rate of Al 2 O 3 particles in a thermal spraying layer is smaller than that of a sintered body.…”
Section: Effect Of Scale Thickness On Spray Coolingmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The heat transfer coefficient on the scale surface was assumed to be 1 100 W/m 2 K, and the thermal conductivity in the scale layer was assumed to be constant regardless of the temperature and scale thickness. The calculated thermal conductivity of the artificial scale layer of Al 2 O 3 was 1.4 W/mK, which was much smaller than the 32 W/mK value of a sintered body, 11) but slightly close to the 3 W/mK of a thermal spraying layer. 12) Takeuchi et al 12) stated that the binding rate of Al 2 O 3 particles in a thermal spraying layer is smaller than that of a sintered body.…”
Section: Effect Of Scale Thickness On Spray Coolingmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It was provided by Hangzhou Wanjingxin Material Co. Ltd. The Al 2 O 3 ceramic coating with a thickness of 300 µm on the TC4 alloy surface was prepared via thermal spraying [31,32], and a sample with a size of 4 × 4 × 1.7 mm 3 was obtained. The experiments were conducted on laser equipment, which included a 4 kW FEIBO fiber laser, and a KUKA robot working table.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%