2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating sucking maturation using two pressure thresholds

Abstract: Background The Medoff-Cooper Nutritive Sucking Apparatus (M-CNSA) has been used to objectively measure sucking maturation in preterm infants. The M-CNSA is able to accurately detect sucking pressures less than 20 mm Hg, however lower pressure thresholds have not previously been used in research. Aims To determine if differences are observed in the number of sucks and maturation in the number of sucks over time when the minimum pressure threshold used to detect a suck is 7 mm Hg compared to 20 mm Hg using the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To standardize the feeding, a member of the research team conducted the feeding for the test sessions. The digital nutritive record was analyzed by Matlab 2007a (Natick, MA: The MathWorks) and a custom Matlab subroutine, Suck_Detect 1.1.12 software 28 for the five minutes that were most representative of the ten minute feeding, according to procedures detailed elsewhere 29 . During this process, portions of the record during which the nipple was removed from the infant's mouth were deleted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To standardize the feeding, a member of the research team conducted the feeding for the test sessions. The digital nutritive record was analyzed by Matlab 2007a (Natick, MA: The MathWorks) and a custom Matlab subroutine, Suck_Detect 1.1.12 software 28 for the five minutes that were most representative of the ten minute feeding, according to procedures detailed elsewhere 29 . During this process, portions of the record during which the nipple was removed from the infant's mouth were deleted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this process, portions of the record during which the nipple was removed from the infant's mouth were deleted. 29 Sucking parameters included NOS, NOS per burst and MAMP. The SMI was derived by calculating and averaging the Z-scores for total NOS, MSPB and MAMP across time points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to full‐term infants, LPIs have weaker suction while eating, which leads to a cascade of events. The uncoordination of the LPIs’ suck, swallow, and breathing places them at risk for fatigue and subsequently insufficient caloric intake because they may be mistaken as being satiated (Walker, ; White‐Traut et al., ).…”
Section: Why Breast Milk Is Important For the Lpimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to full-term infants, LPIs have weaker suction while eating, which leads to a cascade of events. The uncoordination of the LPIs' suck, swallow, and breathing places them at risk for fatigue and subsequently insufficient caloric intake because they may be mistaken as being satiated (Walker, 2008;White-Traut et al, 2013). In addition, LPIs who lack a strong suck during breastfeeding may not transfer enough milk volume to meet their nutritional and hydration needs (Walker, 2008).…”
Section: Breastfeeding Challenges With the Lpimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past century, multiple methods have been employed to quantitatively evaluate infant sucking behavior. A frequently used method has been a pressure transducer that is coupled with a custom-made bottle/nipple system with and without measurements of milk flow rates to the nipple (4)(5)(6)(7). This method has provided objective measurements of intraoral pressure during bottle-feeding, allowing for evaluation of changes in various sucking parameters as an infant matures or in response to feeding interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%