2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating survey instruments and methods in a steep channel

Abstract: Methods for surveying and analyzing channel bed topography commonly lack a rigorous characterization of their appropriateness for project objectives. We compare four survey methods: a hand level, two different methods of surveying with a laser rangefinder, and a realtime kinematic GNSS (RTK-GNSS) to explore their accuracy in determining channel bed slope and roughness for a study reach in a small, dry, steep channel. Additionally, we evaluate the variability among four operators for each survey technique. Two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At each reach, we measured channel geometry and other characteristics using a TruPulse 360 laser rangefinder (Scott et al, 2016), although our measurements were not consistent across all basins because field protocol evolved during the course of the study (Table S1). In the wet glaciogenic basin, we categorized channels by planform and dominant bedform (Montgomery & Buffington, 1997).…”
Section: Reach-scale Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each reach, we measured channel geometry and other characteristics using a TruPulse 360 laser rangefinder (Scott et al, 2016), although our measurements were not consistent across all basins because field protocol evolved during the course of the study (Table S1). In the wet glaciogenic basin, we categorized channels by planform and dominant bedform (Montgomery & Buffington, 1997).…”
Section: Reach-scale Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fixed array of illumination and sensors facilitates repeatability, diminishing errors caused by these factors in subsequent measurements. Other sources of variability between subsequent measurements or operators would be comparable to other surveying methods and negligible, as suggested by Scott et al (2016).…”
Section: Contribution Of Micromorphometry To the Study Of Bedrock Rivmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The field survey protocol consists of initial surveys to describe wood jam characteristics, followed by optional repeat surveys of jam dynamics after high flows. The prescribed measurements can be rapidly, reproducibly, and cheaply collected by a team of two in all fluvial environments using only basic survey equipment (e.g., laser rangefinders; Scott et al, ), a field notebook or mobile device, a GPS‐enabled device, and a camera. The survey procedure generally takes between 5 and 15 min per wood jam for a one to two person team.…”
Section: Wooddam Component Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%