2002
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.308585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Adequacy of the Deposit Insurance Fund: A Credit-Risk Modeling Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings were obtained by Bennett (2002) in a study designed specifically to test the robustness of KSW's results. Reemploying the credit risk modeling technique used by KSW, Bennett finds that the reserve ratio of 1.27% for the BIF (as of December 31, 2001) may not even merit a BBB rating.…”
Section: Megabanks Risk and Deposit Insurancesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar findings were obtained by Bennett (2002) in a study designed specifically to test the robustness of KSW's results. Reemploying the credit risk modeling technique used by KSW, Bennett finds that the reserve ratio of 1.27% for the BIF (as of December 31, 2001) may not even merit a BBB rating.…”
Section: Megabanks Risk and Deposit Insurancesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The probability of insolvency for the combined fund, for example, was 6.2%, compared with 6.5% for the BIF alone. Results from Bennett (2002) reinforce this finding. In her baseline simulations, the reserve ratio for a merged BIF and SAIF would have to be 2.54% to earn an A rating (corresponding to a 0.07% probability of default under Standard and Poor's rating system).…”
Section: Options For Reconciling Megabanks and Deposit Insurancesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…least $40 billion in order for the fund to earn an A-rating (0.10% default probability) and from $92 to $156 billion in order to achieve a AAA rating. Similar findings were obtained by Bennett (2002) in a study designed specifically to test the robustness of KSW's results. Reemploying the credit risk modeling technique used by KSW, Bennett finds that the reserve ratio of 1.27% for the BIF (as of December 31, 2001) may not even merit a BBB rating.…”
Section: Implications For the Bank Insurance Fundsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Because of the huge loss exposures associated with megabanks, KSW estimate that BIF reserves would have to be three to five times larger in order for the BIF to achieve a AAA rating-corresponding to a 0.01% probability of default). Similar findings were obtained by Bennett (2001) in a study that was designed to test the robustness of KSW's results. Reemploying the credit risk modeling technique used by KSW, Bennett finds that the BIF reserve ratio of 1.27% (at year-end 2001) may not even merit a BBB bond rating.…”
Section: Earlier Empirical Worksupporting
confidence: 81%
“…See Standard and Poor's (2007),Table 7. Also, seeBennett (2001) for a discussion of potential sources of bias related to using expected default frequencies based on all corporate credit ratings rather than bank-specific default and rating histories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%