2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4979-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the contributions of muscle activity and joint kinematics to weight perception across multiple joints

Abstract: Perceived heaviness is clearly a function of muscle activity: objects feel heavy, in part because they are lifted with more force than lighter feeling objects. Recent research showed that participants scale their perceptions to the ratio of muscle activity to lift acceleration during elbow lifts (Waddell et al. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 42:363-374, 2016). The current study sought psychophysiological functions relating perceived heaviness to EMG and peak lift acceleration across multiple lifts employing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation of exponents in psychophysical functions has been widely used since Stevens (1957, 1960) to explain the relationship between stimuli and perception. These perceptions include heaviness, brightness, loudness, and more (Kornbrot, Penn, Petrie, Furner, & Hardwick, 2007; Osaka, 1980; Stevens & Stevens, 1963; Waddell & Amazeen, 2017; Waddell et al, in press; Ward & Baumann, 2009). In the current set of experiments, our focus is not on how changes in stimuli alone lead to changes in perception, but on physiological changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interpretation of exponents in psychophysical functions has been widely used since Stevens (1957, 1960) to explain the relationship between stimuli and perception. These perceptions include heaviness, brightness, loudness, and more (Kornbrot, Penn, Petrie, Furner, & Hardwick, 2007; Osaka, 1980; Stevens & Stevens, 1963; Waddell & Amazeen, 2017; Waddell et al, in press; Ward & Baumann, 2009). In the current set of experiments, our focus is not on how changes in stimuli alone lead to changes in perception, but on physiological changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proponents of a rather simple force-effort relationship attest that beyond the linear relation between the force produced and the electromyographic measure of muscle activity demonstrated by [141] during isometric contractions, electromyographic measures are also related to psychological experiences of fatigue, heaviness, and ratings of perceived effort [142][143][144][145][146][147][148]. They recognize muscular activity-specifically the ratio of muscular activity to lifting acceleration [149][150][151][152]-during tasks of dynamic touch [149] as a fundamental factor in perceiving the heaviness of handheld objects, a concept akin to physical/muscular effort. Intuitively, objects feel heavier primarily because they are lifted with greater force than lighter-feeling objects.…”
Section: Misconception #2: Straightforward Relationship Between Emg/m...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a task involving a single DOF about a single joint, the sense of effort, which is related to the descending motor commands, is quantified as the torque that one generates in relation to the maximum torque that can voluntarily be produced 3 , 18 . Recent studies used motor activation patterns and kinematic measures as correlates of descending motor commands to demonstrate the influence of central signals on perceiving an external force 24 , 25 and heaviness 26 during multi-DOF tasks. However, how central signals contribute to one’s perception of a self-generated torque during a multi-DOF, multi-joint task remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%