Evaluating the Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Versions of the Copenhagen Neck Function Disability Scale and Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire

Ghasemi, Fateme; Yoosefinejad, Amin Kordi; Pirouzi, Soraya; Ghaem, Haleh

doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000002781

Cited by 14 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…26 In addition, based on the exploratory factor analysis, we also tested the one-dimensional structure of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire, as well as the study carried out with the Persian version. 24 In all versions tested and compared to the present study, we found unacceptable values for the root mean square error of approximation and chi-square/ degree of freedom.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 43%

“…From this, we compare here four Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire structures (Table 2): structure with one domain and seven items (items 1-7), here called Model 1, as suggested by exploratory factor analysis and the study conducted by Ghasemi et al 24 ; structure with two domains and seven items (domain 1 = items 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7; domain 2 = items 4 and 5), here called Model 2, as suggested by the study of Geri et al 25 ; structure with two domains and six items (domain 1 = items 1, 2, 3, and 6; domain 2 = items 4 and 5), here called Model 3, as suggested by the study of Geri et al 25 ; and structure with two domains and six items (domain 1 = items 2, 3, 6, and 7; domain 2 = items 4 and 5), here called Model 4, as suggested by the study of Özel Asliyüce et al 26 We observed that Models 1, 2, 3, and 4 presented a high amount of residues, identified by the value of root mean square error of approximation > 0.08 and chi-square/degree of freedom > 3.00. In addition, Model 1 has inadequate values for the Tucker-Lewis Index and standardized root mean square residual.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our study used the implementation of parallel analysis in exploratory factor analysis to identify the number of domains. The Italian, 25 Turkish, 26 and Persian studies 24 used eigenvalue > 1 as the factor retention method. The specialized literature points to the overestimation of the number of domains when using the eigenvalue > 1 as a retention method and considers parallel analysis as the method that is more robust and suitable.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[28][29][30][31][32] In addition, the study of the Italian and Persian versions used maximum likelihood as an extraction method. 24,25 The study of the Turkish version did not describe which method of extraction was used. 26 The maximum likelihood method is suitable for continuous variables with a normal distribution.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Brazilian version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire does not have a well-defined internal structure in patients with chronic neck pain

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To investigate the structural validity of the Brazilian version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Community participants collected via online platform. Subjects: Participants with neck pain (minimal pain intensity of 3 points at rest on 11-point Numerical Rating Scale), both genders and aged ⩾18 years old. Main measure: The Numerical Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index, Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire were completed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to identify dimensionality and to compare different structures of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. Results: We included 103 participants. The sample consisted mostly of adults (mean age = 33.64 years, standard deviation = 10.48 years), females (n = 82, 79.6%), lean, single and with higher education. The exploratory factor analysis with implementation of the parallel analysis identified the one-dimensional structure of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire, with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.80 and Bartlett’s test significant ( P < 0.05). We observed that all structures tested in this study presented a high amount of residues in confirmatory factor analysis, which were identified by the value of root mean square error of approximation > 0.08 and chi-square/degree of freedom > 3.00. Conclusion: The internal structure of the Brazilian version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire is not clear and well-defined. It was not possible to identify the construct measured by the instrument in individuals with chronic neck pain.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 43%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Brazilian version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire does not have a well-defined internal structure in patients with chronic neck pain

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…If an item from the questionnaire receives a score equal to or greater than 0.79, it is approved (21). Construct validity: Construct validity of the scale was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis using principal component analysis and varimax rotation (22). The eigenvalues greater than one were considered as having a significant contribution in explaining the overall model variation.…”

Section: Validity Face Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric Analysis of Persian Version of Patient Safety Competency Self-Evaluation in Psychiatric Wards

Torkaman¹,

Momennasab²,

Yektatalab³

et al. 2021

PJMHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Assessment of the patient safety competency is necessary for the growth of nursing and safe care profession as well as evaluation of the nurses' educational needs. To this end, valid and reliable tools are required. Aim:The present study was conducted to determine psychometric properties of the Persian version of the patient safety competency self-evaluation (PSCSE) tool in Iranian psychiatric wards. Methods: All nurses (n = 209) working in two psychiatric hospitals of Kerman, Iran were included in the present cross-sectional study using census method. Followed by administering the Persian version of PSCSE to the participants, its internal consistency and reliability were assessed by test-retest method with an interval of 14 days. Other psychometric properties such as content, construct, and convergent validity of the tool were also examined. Results:The content validity index was 0.65 and the content validity ratio was 0.89. Item 14 was removed from the skill domain because it was not related to the psychiatric ward. According to the results of factor analysis, 40 items and three domains of knowledge (6 items), attitude (14 items), and skills (20 items) were confirmed with acceptable values. In terms of its convergent validity, PSCSE had a moderate correlation (r = 0.57) with the Assessment of the Safe Nursing Care (ASNC) scale. The correlation coefficient for test-retest was ICC = 0.92 for the whole instrument and 0.89, 0.89, and 0.92 for the domains of knowledge, attitude, and skill, respectively. The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) of the whole tool was 0.95 and 0.95, 0.79, and 0. 95 for the domains of knowledge, attitude, and skill, respectievly. Conclusion: Persian version of the nurses' competency tool in ensuring patient safety in psychiatric wards has acceptable psychometric characteristics. Keywords: Validity, Reliability, Confirmatory factor analysis, Patient safety competency, psychiatric nurse

show abstract

Psychometric validation of the simplified Chinese Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain

Huang

Yan

et al. 2022

PM&R

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Reliable and valid measurement tools are crucial for clinical practice in chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNSNP). The Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS) is a widely used scale in neck pain assessment and has its unique advantages, but it is not available for patients with CNSNP in southern China. Objective: To develop the simplified Chinese version of CNFDS (CNFDS-SC) cross-culturally and to investigate its measurement properties in patients with CNSNP. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Validation of neck pain measurement scale in southern China. Patients: One hundred five patients with CNSNP. Interventions: Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures: Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Construct validity and structural validity were validated by hypothesis testing and exploratory factor analysis, respectively. Internal and external responsiveness were validated. Interpretability was revealed by the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Results: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.77 for first test and 0.84 for retest) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95) were satisfactory. CNFDS-SC scores showed strong correlations with the numeric rating scale (NRS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) scores (r = 0.652, 0.763, and 0.719, respectively; p < .001). Factor analysis revealed a one-factor structure of the scale. Regarding responsiveness, the standardized response mean (SRM) and the Guyatt's responsiveness index (GRI) were 1.29 and 2.12, respectively. CNFDS-SC change scores showed good correlations with the anchoring question (r = 0.619, p < .001), NDI (r = 0.439, p = .001), and NPQ (r = 0.438 p = .001) change scores; the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.89 (p < .001). The SEM and SDC were 0.93 and 2.57, respectively. No floor or ceiling effect and no missing items were observed. Conclusion:The CNFDS-SC was demonstrated with adequate reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability. The CNFDS-SC could be an effective tool for the clinical assessment of patients with CNSNP in southern China. BACKGROUNDNeck pain is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder worldwide. The Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 Zhengqi Huang and Jiansen Yan contributed equally to this work.

show abstract

Evaluating the Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Versions of the Copenhagen Neck Function Disability Scale and Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire

Abstract: 2.

Cited by 14 publications

References 33 publications

Brazilian version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire does not have a well-defined internal structure in patients with chronic neck pain

Brazilian version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire does not have a well-defined internal structure in patients with chronic neck pain

Psychometric Analysis of Persian Version of Patient Safety Competency Self-Evaluation in Psychiatric Wards

Psychometric validation of the simplified Chinese Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About