2018
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-58392018000200173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effect of coal mining subsidence on the agricultural soil quality using principal component analysis

Abstract: Quantifying the effects of coal mining subsidence on soil quality is critical for developing sustainable strategies in the local agriculture. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of slope position because of coal mining on soil quality using principal component analysis. Soil samples were collected from five positions in the subsided farmland: Top slope position (1), upper slope position (2), middle slope position (3), lower slope position (4), and bottom position (5). Samples from an adjacent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil physical and chemical properties play a central role in soil quality and are extensively used as soil quality indicators in the assessment and monitoring of degraded ecosystems [14]. Organic matter, nitrogen, and potassium contents are lower in mining subsided soils than in unmined soils, but the bulk density in mining subsided soils is higher than that in unmined areas [15]. The soil organic matter and available nutrients increase and the soil quality improves after the reclamation of a mining subsidence area [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil physical and chemical properties play a central role in soil quality and are extensively used as soil quality indicators in the assessment and monitoring of degraded ecosystems [14]. Organic matter, nitrogen, and potassium contents are lower in mining subsided soils than in unmined soils, but the bulk density in mining subsided soils is higher than that in unmined areas [15]. The soil organic matter and available nutrients increase and the soil quality improves after the reclamation of a mining subsidence area [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The igraph and vegan in R (4.1.0) were used for statistical analysis The factor analysis was used to calculate the soil fertility index (SFI) (Supplementary Text S4) (Li et al, 2014;Guo et al, 2018). The relationships between soil physicochemical properties and microbial alpha diversity indexes were detected by Pearson correlation analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…*BD -bulk density, OC -soil organic carbon, CEC -cation exchange capacity, POT -exchangeable potassium, N2 -available nitrogen, PHOS -available phosphorus, MOIS -moisture, COND -electrical conductivity high factor loading with absolute values within 10% of the highest factor loading are regarded as highly weighted factors and thus were retained for MDS. To reduce the redundancy among the highly weighted variables, given that more than one factor are present for a single principal component, Pearson's correlation coefficients among the highly weighted variables are required to determine those redundant variables and to be eliminated from the MDS (Andrews et al, 2002;Guo et al, 2018;Yu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Soil Quality Index (Sqi) Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all the corresponding observations, the S values are calculated as the ratio of the observed value over the highest observation value. Similarly, parameters identified as bad for the soil are tagged as "less is better"; the lowest loaded value was assigned a score of 1, and the S values for all the corresponding observations were calculated as the ratio of the lowest value over the observed value of samples for each variable (Guo et al, 2018). The methods discussed in Sharma et al (2005) were used to calculate the values of W using the PCA results.…”
Section: Soil Quality Index (Sqi) Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%