2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effectiveness of integrating the environmental impact assessment and mine closure planning processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While the development of such methods is necessary to enhance data collection to provide accurate performance data, the evaluation by Scrucca et al (2016) does not illuminate how the organizers of the event worked on assessed targets and improved performance. Furthermore, researchers of sustainability impact assessments, who also look at internal business practices, inquire into the procedures around impact assessments but not into linkages to the impacts assessed (see, e.g., Boele & Crispin, 2013; Esteves, 2008; Getty & Morrison‐Saunders, 2020). Given the complexity of sustainability impact assessments, there is a need to better understand how the conduct of these assessments can be improved for businesses (Esteves, 2008; Luke & Noble, 2019; Mullender et al, 2020).…”
Section: Previous Servings In Business Sustainability Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the development of such methods is necessary to enhance data collection to provide accurate performance data, the evaluation by Scrucca et al (2016) does not illuminate how the organizers of the event worked on assessed targets and improved performance. Furthermore, researchers of sustainability impact assessments, who also look at internal business practices, inquire into the procedures around impact assessments but not into linkages to the impacts assessed (see, e.g., Boele & Crispin, 2013; Esteves, 2008; Getty & Morrison‐Saunders, 2020). Given the complexity of sustainability impact assessments, there is a need to better understand how the conduct of these assessments can be improved for businesses (Esteves, 2008; Luke & Noble, 2019; Mullender et al, 2020).…”
Section: Previous Servings In Business Sustainability Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, produce preocupaciones sobre la gestión del medio ambiente, el desempleo y la sostenibilidad de los servicios sociales y el desarrollo económico [3]. Por lo tanto, la planificación e implementación del cierre de la mina debe integrarse con el ciclo de vida de la minería desde las primeras etapas del proyecto, debido a que muchas minas sufren un cierre imprevisto y no planificado debido a presiones sociales, económicas y ambientales [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A nivel internacional, existe una expectativa bien establecida por parte de la industria minera de que la planificación ambiental en las minas debe ser un elemento inherente a todo el ciclo de vida de un proyecto minero en cada una de sus etapas: implementación, desmantelamiento, rehabilitación final y cierre [6]. La planificación del cierre de la mina debe ser proactiva, comenzar temprano, y que la planificación en curso se vuelva progresivamente más detallada a medida que se acerca el final del ciclo de vida de una operación minera; esto refleja los principios para la mitigación y la gestión ambiental en la Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental (EIA); por ejemplo, se establecen vínculos explícitos entre la EIA y la planificación del cierre de la mina [5], [7], [8], destacando la importancia de identificar y evaluar los impactos ambientales y sociales de la minería centrándose en gran medida en los factores biofísicos, sociales y económicos junto con la implementación de medidas apropiadas de mitigación, gestión, monitoreo y control para desarrollar la EIA para un proyecto minero propuesto.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this statement may seem self-evident, many of the technical measures currently in use have not been scientific evaluated for their effectiveness while others may still be using outdated information that has not been subject to review (Reichenberger et al, 2007;Gwimbi and Nhamo, 2016;Evans et al, 2021). There are likely several reasons for the paucity of information on the effectiveness of technical measures, we suspect that one important reason is that there is little guidance on how to frame scientific assessments of effectiveness for technical measures (May et al, 2017;Cormier et al, 2018;Getty and Morrison-Saunders, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%