2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2004.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effectiveness of private education across countries: a comparison of methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
47
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the effect of living in a city of more than 100,000 inhabitants on the probability of attending a private-voucher school is highly significant and indicates a marginal effect of 0.318. That is an effect higher than those estimated by Vandenberghe and Robin (2004), who reported values ranging from 0.18 to 0.25 using PISA 2000 data for Spain. The estimated probability, the PRIVATE_HAT variable, replaces the observed PRIVATE variable in the estimation of the distance function (Equation (3)).…”
contrasting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, the effect of living in a city of more than 100,000 inhabitants on the probability of attending a private-voucher school is highly significant and indicates a marginal effect of 0.318. That is an effect higher than those estimated by Vandenberghe and Robin (2004), who reported values ranging from 0.18 to 0.25 using PISA 2000 data for Spain. The estimated probability, the PRIVATE_HAT variable, replaces the observed PRIVATE variable in the estimation of the distance function (Equation (3)).…”
contrasting
confidence: 60%
“…As an explanatory variable in this model, other than all those present in the distance function, we included as the instrument a binary variable CITY -equal to one if a student lives in a city of more than 100,000 inhabitants, and zero otherwise. We follow here Vandenberghe and Robin (2004), who showed that, in the case of Spain, and using PISA 2000 data, this variable appears to be positively correlated with school choices, private-voucher versus public, but not with student performance. In other words, CITY appears to be the best candidate variable to correct for endogeneity bias in educational efficiency models.…”
Section: Other Variablesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this, we build on research that was conducted in the policy and management field (Green et al, 1996;Delmas and Tokat, 2005;Khanna and Damon, 1999;King and Lenox, 2000;Rivera, 2002;Rivera and DeLeon, 2004;Vandenberghe and Robin, 2004;Welch et al, 2000).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vandenberghe and Robin (2004) attempted to estimate the effect of private vs. public education on pupils' achievement using the 2000 OECD PISA survey, taking into account the potential bias due to the existence of unobserved confounding factors. They used three methods: IV regression, Heckman's 2-stage approach and Propensity Score Matching and compared the estimates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%