2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effects of forest fire on water balance using fire susceptibility maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The MODIS Collection 6 fire archive was used in this paper for wildfire susceptibility model construction [57,59]. MODIS hotspots have been adopted by many researchers for susceptibility mapping [60,61]. The fire products were downloaded from Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS).…”
Section: Hazard Inventoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MODIS Collection 6 fire archive was used in this paper for wildfire susceptibility model construction [57,59]. MODIS hotspots have been adopted by many researchers for susceptibility mapping [60,61]. The fire products were downloaded from Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS).…”
Section: Hazard Inventoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topographic variables also have a strong influence on RFFO, such as the relief inclination and orientation (MOTA et al, 2019;NADERPOUR et al, 2019;VENKATESH et al, 2020;ÇOLAK et al, 2020). Thus, it is possible to notice from Figure 3 that the study area does not present high slopes, with 30.93% being the highest inclination found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Our results are in parallel with the conclusions made by [79], stating that the bias of rainfall products determines the accuracy of runoff simulations by a model. e reason specified for the conclusion (streamflow simulations are affected by the bias of a product) as per [16,42] is related to the nonlinearity of the hydrologic process, where moderate rainfall bias can be transmuted into large PBias in discharge simulations. In correspondence to the above conclusion, the RMSE and bias values of SM2RAIN-CCI and GPCP-CDR v1.3 might have adversely affected the hydrologic performance and contributed to unsatisfactory discharge simulations.…”
Section: From Gauge-adjusted Dataset Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e performance of Princeton datasets (PGF 0.5°and PGF 0.25°) was moderate in both statistical and hydrological analyses because of high bias and less precipitation detection capabilities. From the results of PGF and CHIRPS SPPs that have multiple spatial resolutions, the datasets with finer resolution (PGF 0.25°and CHIRPS 0.05°) proved effective compared to coarse 16 Advances in Meteorology resolution products (PGF 0.5°and CHIRPS 0.25°). One possible reason for the better performance of fine scale products can be attributed to the size of the catchment considered in the study.…”
Section: From Reanalysis Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation