2012
DOI: 10.1121/1.4742723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effects of olivocochlear feedback on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity

Abstract: Frequency selectivity was evaluated under two conditions designed to assess the influence of a "precursor" stimulus on auditory filter bandwidths. The standard condition consisted of a short masker, immediately followed by a short signal. The precursor condition was identical except a 100-ms sinusoid at the signal frequency (i.e., the precursor) was presented before the masker. The standard and precursor conditions were compared for measurements of psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs), and notched noise tuning … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(120 reference statements)
6
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Francis and Guinan (2010) pointed out some problems in interpreting the effects of CS on PTCs. The NBN masker used to measure the PTC itself elicits efferent activity, especially when the masker level is high, which happens when its frequency is well above or below the signal frequency (Guinan, 2006;Jennings et al, 2009;Strickland, 2001;Jennings and Strickland, 2012). The efferent activity elicited by the NBN masker can affect both the response to the signal and the efferent activity elicited by the CS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Francis and Guinan (2010) pointed out some problems in interpreting the effects of CS on PTCs. The NBN masker used to measure the PTC itself elicits efferent activity, especially when the masker level is high, which happens when its frequency is well above or below the signal frequency (Guinan, 2006;Jennings et al, 2009;Strickland, 2001;Jennings and Strickland, 2012). The efferent activity elicited by the NBN masker can affect both the response to the signal and the efferent activity elicited by the CS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because PTCs and filter functions are assumed to measure the response of a single auditory filter centered at f T , these two types of spectral masking functions are commonly used as estimates of auditory frequency resolution (e.g. [16, 30, 37]) and cannot be used as indicators of the spectral spread of masking produced by the masker. In contrast, masking patterns are measured for fixed f M and L M and variable f T and L T .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that activation of the MOCR can affect masking by reducing cochlear gain and, as a byproduct, by reducing frequency resolution and cochlear nonlinearity (e.g. [37, 41, 43, 44]). This reflex has a delay of about 20–25 ms between the onset of the stimulus and the onset of the gain reduction [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model simulations followed the approach of Jennings and Strickland (2012) and Jennings et al (2014). Briefly, peripheral processing was simulated using the model of Zilany et al (2009), based on cat physiology.…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%