2013
DOI: 10.3390/rs5094450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Effects of Shadow Detection on QuickBird Image Classification and Spectroradiometric Restoration

Abstract: Shadows in high resolution imagery create significant problems for urban land cover classification and environmental application. We first investigated whether shadows were intrinsically different and hypothetically possible to separate from each other with ground spectral measurements. Both pixel-based and object-oriented methods were used to evaluate the effects of shadow detection on QuickBird image classification and spectroradiometric restoration. In each method, shadows were detected and separated either… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since shadows in VHR multispectral remote sensing images indicate additional information about ground objects, shadows may supply useful information for applications such as buildings reconstruction and height evaluation [11,12]. Notably, shadows always result in loss and distortion of land cover within shadow regions, because shadow regions always present low radiance and different spectral reflectivity properties from nonshadow areas [3,[13][14][15][16][17]. However, objects in shadow regions may contain significant information, especially in VHR multispectral remote sensing images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since shadows in VHR multispectral remote sensing images indicate additional information about ground objects, shadows may supply useful information for applications such as buildings reconstruction and height evaluation [11,12]. Notably, shadows always result in loss and distortion of land cover within shadow regions, because shadow regions always present low radiance and different spectral reflectivity properties from nonshadow areas [3,[13][14][15][16][17]. However, objects in shadow regions may contain significant information, especially in VHR multispectral remote sensing images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-resolution multispectral data, by contrast, are widely available, offering great opportunities to better resolve the spatial heterogeneous details of urban landscapes where land cover changes in a short distance [71][72][73].Urban tree canopy maps derived from high-resolution multispectral imagery have been used to scale-up biomass estimates from limited field plots to the surrounding landscape [18,57]. However, tree misclassification, often caused by shadows [74], spectral confusion with other vegetation types [75], and insufficient field sampling, directly affects the accuracy of biomass estimation [76]. The reported accuracy of tree classification was 74.3% with QuickBird satellite imagery in Los Angeles, California [9] and 86.2% with digital color-infrared aerial imagery in Syracuse, New York [77].The classification accuracy of high-resolution imagery was even lower at the species level [54].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban tree canopy maps derived from high-resolution multispectral imagery have been used to scale-up biomass estimates from limited field plots to the surrounding landscape [18,57]. However, tree misclassification, often caused by shadows [74], spectral confusion with other vegetation types [75], and insufficient field sampling, directly affects the accuracy of biomass estimation [76]. The reported accuracy of tree classification was 74.3% with QuickBird satellite imagery in Los Angeles, California [9] and 86.2% with digital color-infrared aerial imagery in Syracuse, New York [77].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shadows exist in most very high resolution (VHR) orthoimagery (with a resolution of up to 1 m) and lead to more complex and detailed land-cover features, especially in urban areas [1]. Shadow areas usually have incomplete spectral information, lower intensity, and fuzzy boundaries, which seriously affect the subsequent interpretation [2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current methods for shadow detection can be divided into three types [11][12][13]: (1) property-based methods [9,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; (2) geometrical methods [14,[17][18][19][20]; and (3) machine learning methods [15,16,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%