2012
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effects of variation in clinical practice: a risk adjusted cost-effectiveness (RAC-E) analysis of acute stroke services

Abstract: BackgroundMethods for the cost-effectiveness analysis of health technologies are now well established, but such methods may also have a useful role in the context of evaluating the effects of variation in applied clinical practice. This study illustrates a general methodology for the comparative analysis of applied clinical practice at alternative institutions – risk adjusted cost-effectiveness (RAC-E) analysis – with an application that compares acute hospital services for stroke patients admitted to the main… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Although economic analyses have shown HF clinics to be a cost-effective means of disease management, it is not known which specific structure and process measures are most important to reduce health care costs. [16][17][18] Previous investigators have focused on drivers of HF-related costs at the end of life 19,20 ; however, guidelines suggest that referrals to HF clinics should occur early after a HF hospitalization, a period that represents a distinct phase of HF-related costs. [16][17][18] Previous investigators have focused on drivers of HF-related costs at the end of life 19,20 ; however, guidelines suggest that referrals to HF clinics should occur early after a HF hospitalization, a period that represents a distinct phase of HF-related costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Although economic analyses have shown HF clinics to be a cost-effective means of disease management, it is not known which specific structure and process measures are most important to reduce health care costs. [16][17][18] Previous investigators have focused on drivers of HF-related costs at the end of life 19,20 ; however, guidelines suggest that referrals to HF clinics should occur early after a HF hospitalization, a period that represents a distinct phase of HF-related costs. [16][17][18] Previous investigators have focused on drivers of HF-related costs at the end of life 19,20 ; however, guidelines suggest that referrals to HF clinics should occur early after a HF hospitalization, a period that represents a distinct phase of HF-related costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost-effectiveness of clinical interventions (e.g., diagnostic tests, therapies or medicines) is normally assessed using current clinical care as a comparator, with national guidelines as a proxy for current care [ 1 , 2 ]. However, this comparison with guidelines is inadequate when clinical practice differs significantly from guidelines and is particularly problematic when clinical practice differs between hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both documents pay little attention to clinical practice variation and its consequences when performing relevant cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). In practice, most cost-effectiveness studies do not take into account possible causes and consequences of clinical practice variation [ 1 , 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a RAC‐E analysis, comparison groups are not imposed, but are based on observed characteristics that are relevant to the policy question being addressed. Previous applications have compared services provided for specific diagnoses at alternative hospitals (13, 14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%