Evaluating the Effects That Existing Instruction on Responsible Conduct of Research Has on Ethical Decision Making

Abstract

Purpose To examine the effects that existing courses on the responsible conduct of research (RCR) have on ethical decision making by assessing the ethicality of decisions made in response to ethical problems and the underlying processes involved in ethical decision making. These processes included how an individual thinks through ethical problems (i.e., meta-cognitive reasoning strategies) and the emphasis placed on social dimensions of ethical problems (i.e., social–behavioral responses). Method In 2005–2007, recruitment announcements were made, stating that a nationwide, online study was being conducted to examine the impact of RCR instruction on the ethical decision making of scientists. Recruitment yielded contacts with over 200 RCR faculty at 21 research universities and medical schools; 40 (20%) RCR instructors enrolled their courses in the current study. From those courses, 173 participants completed an ethical decision-making measure. Results A mixed pattern of effects emerged. The ethicality of decisions did not improve as a result of RCR instruction and even decreased for decisions pertaining to business aspects of research, such as contract bidding. Course participants improved on some meta-cognitive reasoning strategies, such as awareness of the situation and consideration of personal motivations, but declined for seeking help and considering others’ perspectives. Participants also increased in their endorsement of detrimental social–behavioral responses, such as deception, retaliation, and avoidance of personal responsibility. Conclusions These findings indicated that RCR instruction may not be as effective as intended, and in fact, may even be harmful. Harmful effects might result if instruction leads students to overstress avoidance of ethical problems, be overconfident in their ability to handle ethical problems, or overemphasize their ethical nature. Future research must examine these and other possible obstacles to effective RCR instruction.

Stop ignoring misconduct

“…Not surprisingly, it failed in its goal of reducing research misconduct 5 -which it defines as fabrication, falsification or plagiarism. Presumably, the ethics proscribing such practices are established long before people enter science.…”

On Monetary and Non-Monetary Interventions to Combat Corruption

“…Waples et al (2009) conduct a meta-analysis that shows there is, if any, a minimal impact of ethics courses on outcomes. In a related study, Antes et al (2010) find that a course on responsible conduct of research has little impact on actual ethical decisions scientists take. The limitations of these studies lie in their outcome measures, which are attitudinal and not behavioral.…”

The Importance of Animal Welfare Science and Ethics to Veterinary Students in Australia and New Zealand

“…Research on the development of ethical behavior in the sciences indicates that separate, interactive courses based around seminars were more successful in teaching ethics than embedded courses using traditional teaching methods. 26 Effective educational tools include instruction on using animal ethics frameworks for decision making and participation in animal ethics scenarios that present a moral conflict or dilemma. 27 Similarly, a 3-hour interactive small-group workshop on moral development theory and ethical decision making applied to real animal ethics' issues was effective in increasing principled (as opposed to personal) interest and reasoning, but giving students similar information in a 50-minute lecture format had no effect on their reasoning method.…”