2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Evidence: Web Sites

Abstract: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is essential to improving patient safety and the effectiveness of health care practices, but a lack of computer literacy can hinder access to and availability of EBP in the clinical setting. Accurate evaluation of web site content is essential, including determining bias, validity, and fit to a patient population. Methods to evaluate web sites and techniques for efficient access to web resources are presented and discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many different categories of levels of evidence. Hoss and Hanson 9 explicate a variety of hierarchical models that range from high strength of evidence, including systematic reviews or meta‐analysis of multiple controlled studies, to the lower level of knowledge of expert opinion. Following are some issues to explore: Authorship: Who are the authors and are they qualified?…”
Section: Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many different categories of levels of evidence. Hoss and Hanson 9 explicate a variety of hierarchical models that range from high strength of evidence, including systematic reviews or meta‐analysis of multiple controlled studies, to the lower level of knowledge of expert opinion. Following are some issues to explore: Authorship: Who are the authors and are they qualified?…”
Section: Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cader (2013) describes a process approach to evaluating with the following components or criteria: assessing user friendliness, assessing outlook, assessing authority, assessing relationship to nursing practice, appraising the nature of the evidence and applying cross-checking strategies. Hoss and Hanson (2008) placed evaluating websites into the context of evidence based practice and offered questions…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cader (2013) describes a process approach to evaluating with the following components or criteria: assessing user friendliness, assessing outlook, assessing authority, assessing relationship to nursing practice, appraising the nature of the evidence and applying cross‐checking strategies. Hoss and Hanson (2008) placed evaluating websites into the context of evidence based practice and offered questions for nurses to ask as they use websites. It remains unclear, however, if nurses who are aware of these criteria and questions put forth in the literature actually implemented them into their practice, or whether teaching evaluation skills using checklists is a viable approach (Meola, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%