Evaluating the factor structure, item analyses, and internal consistency of hospital anxiety and depression scale in Iranian infertile patients

Abstract

Background:The hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) is a common screening tool designed to measure the level of anxiety and depression in different factor structures and has been extensively used in non-psychiatric populations and individuals experiencing fertility problems. Objective: The aims of this study were to evaluate the factor structure, item analyses, and internal consistency of HADS in Iranian infertile patients. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 651 infertile patients (248 men and 403 women) referred to a referral infertility Center in Tehran, Iran between January 2014 and January 2015. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the underlying factor structure of the HADS among one, two, and threefactor models. Several goodness of fit indices were utilized such as comparative, normed and goodness of fit indices, Akaike information criterion, and the root mean squared error of approximation. In addition to HADS, the Satisfaction with Life Scale questionnaires as well as demographic and clinical information were administered to all patients. Results: The goodness of fit indices through CFAs exposed that three and onefactor model provided the best and worst fit to the total, male and female datasets compared to the other factor structure models for the infertile patients. The Cronbach's alpha for anxiety and depression subscales were 0.866 and 0.753 respectively. The HADS subscales significantly correlated with SWLS, indicating an acceptable convergent validity. Conclusion: The HADS was found to be a three-factor structure screening instrument in the field of infertility.

The relationship between marital satisfaction and depression in infertile couples: an actor–partner interdependence model approach

“…Both subscales scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater levels of anxiety and depression. The Persian version of the HADS has shown satisfactory reliability and validity in infertile people [ 23 ] and has been used in many studies involving infertile people [ 3 , 24 ]. In this study, we used only the HADS-D subscale.…”

Application of the dyadic data analysis in behavioral medicine research: marital satisfaction and anxiety in infertile couples

“…Both subscales scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater levels of anxiety and depression. The Persian version of HADS has been validated [ 23 ] and widely used among infertile patients [ 4 , 23 ]. For this study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the HADS-A for males and females were 0.841 and 0.865, respectively.…”

Anxiety, depression and probability of live birth in a cohort of women with self-reported infertility in the HUNT 2 Study and Medical Birth Registry of Norway

“…recent study evaluating the factor structure of the HADS in a sample of men and women at an infertility clinic concluded that a three-factor had better fit [21]. However, the above mentioned limitations, which may lead to increased risk of Type II error, may be partly outweighted by the larger statistical power due to the large sample size in the study.…”

“…This is probably the reason why anxiety and depression detected by HADS in randomly timed health studies seem to predict clinically relevant outcomes [26,27]. Further, although a number of psychometric studies of the HADS observed a 2-factor solution with acceptable model fit for the HADS [21,28], a…”