2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9551-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Illinois Stream Valley Segment Model as an Effective Management Tool

Abstract: This research is a product of the graduate program in Biological Sciences at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide range of environmental variables on climate, geology, land use, soils and topography were summarised at four different spatial scales, all of which are related to the reach: (i) the total catchment (WT), the drainage above the downstream end of a reach; (ii) the local catchment (W), the area that drains into a reach directly; (iii) the 30‐m riparian zone in the total catchment (RT); and (iv) the 30‐m riparian zone in the local catchment (R). The effectiveness of reaches in partitioning the variation in fish assemblages and habitat variables among sampling sites has been confirmed in two recent studies (Warner et al ., ; Wang et al ., ).…”
Section: Sampling and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of environmental variables on climate, geology, land use, soils and topography were summarised at four different spatial scales, all of which are related to the reach: (i) the total catchment (WT), the drainage above the downstream end of a reach; (ii) the local catchment (W), the area that drains into a reach directly; (iii) the 30‐m riparian zone in the total catchment (RT); and (iv) the 30‐m riparian zone in the local catchment (R). The effectiveness of reaches in partitioning the variation in fish assemblages and habitat variables among sampling sites has been confirmed in two recent studies (Warner et al ., ; Wang et al ., ).…”
Section: Sampling and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a hierarchical framework this generalizes finer scale variability within segments such as sedimentary links, pools, rifles, and lateral sediment sources to answer questions at appropriate scales (Frissell et al 1986;Rice and Church 1998). Recently, stream network segmentation schemas have been tested to assess the homogeneity within segments and whether assigned classes are actually different (Warrner et al 2010). For these types of assessments, researchers avoid sampling near confluences because they are not representative of stream reaches and segments as a whole because of complex fluvial dynamics and flow mixing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dams, ponds, or abrupt change points for slope or geology also can act as the boundary of a reach. Both habitats and fish samples were more similar within a reach than among reaches in other studies, and a reach is thus an appropriate unit of stream network (Warrner et al 2010;Wang et al 2011). The total watershed (WT) was defined as the total upstream land area draining into the most downstream point of the reach sampled, and analyses at this scale were intended to evaluate effects of inputs from the entire drainage area on a sampling location.…”
Section: Land-cover Data Compilingmentioning
confidence: 93%