Evaluating the Impact of a Medical School Student-Run Research Organization on Scholarly Activity

Abstract

IntroductionThe United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 change to Pass/Fail scoring has motivated medical students to pursue more research opportunities. To support students, a student-led organization was created at an allopathic medical school, offering initiatives such as workshops, mentorship, and research projects. Here, we evaluate its impact on medical student research. MethodsAn observational survey study was conducted to assess students' research involvement and productivity and their sense of support, confidence, and comfort in pursuing research at an institution during the first two years of medical school. These variables were compared between three contiguous classes of students and between club members and non-members. Analyses included t-tests, Chi-square tests, and ANOVA, among others. ResultsFindings revealed that organization membership was associated with an increased number of research projects. Club members (M= 4.49) reported a significantly greater number of projects compared to nonmembers (M= 4.49) (p= 0.002). Students who had access to the organization during their preclinical years (M= 4.38) reported significantly more projects compared to students whose preclinical years were before the organization's conception (M= 2.21) (p= 0.041). However, research productivity and feelings of support and confidence in research did not differ by class or club membership. ConclusionsClub members engaged in a greater number of research projects as compared to non-members and students who had access to the organization during their preclinical years. The implementation of similar organizations at every medical school can allow more students to engage in scholarly work.

Assessment of Postgraduate Academic Productivity Following a Longitudinal Research Program in a Medical School Curriculum

“…Previous observations and studies have indicated that universities that implement these programs within their curriculum often see an enhancement in the medical student's educational experience. These findings have been supported by the literature that has not only observed an increase in academic outcomes but clinical readiness as well [14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”

Letter: Neurological Surgery Residency Programs in the United States: A National Cross-Sectional Survey

“…Evaluating publications as a numbers game, particularly in lieu of standardized test scores, has led to an explosion of resume padding, forcing students to focus on volume over quality, but is not necessarily a good predictor of resident success. [2][3][4][5][6] This can encourage applicants to seek out "paper mills" which turn out high quantities of papers with a many names which does not correlate to authors' involvement, and the trend is then carried forward through residency. This method is flawed as a measure of interest in and dedication to the field: These high-output groups may not be publishing topics of interest for learners, but simply act as another checkbox for resumes.…”