2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the impact of alternative intervention strategies in accelerating onchocerciasis elimination in an area of persistent transmission in the West Region of Cameroon

Abstract: Background Alternative strategies are recommended to accelerate onchocerciasis elimination in problematic areas including areas where annual ivermectin (IVM) distributions are unable to interrupt transmission. The aim of this study was to accelerate progress towards elimination in the Massangam health district, West Region of Cameroon where impact evaluations demonstrated ongoing transmission of onchocerciasis infection and high microfilaria (mf) prevalence despite more than 20 years of annual IVM distribution… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Programme staff expressed concern about timing between of ivermectin and TTd, citing a lack of clarity on how ivermectin will impact TTd. This resulted to testing in intervention 1 being less than three months since CDTi, suspected to have contributed to low detected infection level during intervention 1 compared to baseline (Intervention 1: 24%, n = 643, Table 2 vs baseline: 36%, n = 557) [ 16 , 18 ]. This prompted a catch-up round (intervention 2) where everyone was offered testing and results revealed a higher infection level than in round 1 (round 2 being 29%, n = 879, Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Programme staff expressed concern about timing between of ivermectin and TTd, citing a lack of clarity on how ivermectin will impact TTd. This resulted to testing in intervention 1 being less than three months since CDTi, suspected to have contributed to low detected infection level during intervention 1 compared to baseline (Intervention 1: 24%, n = 643, Table 2 vs baseline: 36%, n = 557) [ 16 , 18 ]. This prompted a catch-up round (intervention 2) where everyone was offered testing and results revealed a higher infection level than in round 1 (round 2 being 29%, n = 879, Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing CDTi immediately after skin snip collection followed by doxycycline treatment to people with detected mf, would give beneficiaries immediate and sustained symptoms clearance [ 31 ]. It will also be more impactful by breaking the transmission cycle quicker as evident in the impact evaluation of these interventions and elsewhere [ 18 , 32 ]. There are some evidence that even though mf are still present for >12 months after doxycycline treatment, their ability to be transmitted is hindered [ 8 , 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations