2015
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Impacts of Selected Packaging Materials on the Quality Attributes of Cassava Flour (cvs. TME 419 and UMUCASS 36)

Abstract: The influence of packaging materials (plastic bucket, low density polyethylene [LDPE] bags and paper bags) on quality attributes of the flour of 2 cassava cultivars (TME 419 and UMUCASS 36) stored at 23 ± 2 °C and 60% relative humidity (RH) were investigated for 12 wk. Cassava flour from each package type was evaluated for proximate composition, physicochemical properties and microbial growth at 4-wk intervals. Total color difference (∆E) of both cassava flour cultivars increased with storage duration. Flour p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the packaging showed a significant effect on fungal presence, with packaged samples surprisingly showing a higher level of contamination than unpackaged ones marketed in bulk. The higher contamination level in packaged samples is in accordance with those reported in previous studies [ 21 , 90 ]. For sealed plastic packages, this could be explained by the lack of air exchanges with the external environment, which also means: (a) lack of further contamination by external fungi, with the consequence that the level of contamination depends on the quality of the packaged material; (b) creation of humidity content inside the packages, which contributes to the development of mycobioma already present on the material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, the packaging showed a significant effect on fungal presence, with packaged samples surprisingly showing a higher level of contamination than unpackaged ones marketed in bulk. The higher contamination level in packaged samples is in accordance with those reported in previous studies [ 21 , 90 ]. For sealed plastic packages, this could be explained by the lack of air exchanges with the external environment, which also means: (a) lack of further contamination by external fungi, with the consequence that the level of contamination depends on the quality of the packaged material; (b) creation of humidity content inside the packages, which contributes to the development of mycobioma already present on the material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…During the storage of CF, the whiteness, cyanide, and total carotenoids content decrease in the course of transportation and sales. Opara et al [68] investigated the effect of plastic buckets, LPDE, and paper bags on the physicochemical and microbial stability of flour of two cassava cultivars under the same temperature and humidity (23 ± 2 • C and 60% relative humidity) for 12 weeks. Total color difference (∆E) increased with storage time for flours packed in plastic buckets, giving the least color change.…”
Section: Packaging Materials and Storage Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, a major postharvest challenge concerning the shelf life and quality of food products, including oleaginous products, is represented by the use of proper packaging materials. Although the most important role of food packaging is to maintain quality and food safety, these criteria are difficult to meet, especially for plastic packaging [ 32 , 33 ]. The positive side of plastic packaging is that, due to its transparency, it allows ultraviolet (UV) light passage, followed by a small reduction of aflatoxins contamination [ 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%