2015
DOI: 10.1080/1755876x.2015.1014640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the impacts of the tropical Pacific observing system on the ocean analysis fields in the global ocean data assimilation system for operational seasonal forecasts in JMA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[], and Fujii et al . [] suggested. In addition, a large computational resource is required for OSEs for eddy‐scale phenomena in the global ocean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[], and Fujii et al . [] suggested. In addition, a large computational resource is required for OSEs for eddy‐scale phenomena in the global ocean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JMA/MRI also conducted a series of OSEs to evaluate the relative impact of Argo floats and TAO/TRITON buoys on the ocean DA fields and ENSO forecasts using an operational seasonal forecasting system (Fujii et al , , ). The system uses the nearly‐global ocean DA system, MOVE‐G (Multivariate Ocean Variational Estimation System Global Version; Fujii et al , ), for the ocean initialization, in which a multivariate 3D‐Var scheme assimilates satellite SSH, gridded SST, and in situ temperature and salinity profiles, including data from Argo, XBT, and tropical moorings.…”
Section: Observing System Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the run without TAO/TRITON (noTTA80) is roughly similar to the ARGO40 run in NINO‐3 and NINO‐4 regions, implying impacts of TAO/TRITON is similar to 40% of Argo data. It should be noted that we evaluated here the impacts of TAO/TRITON complementary to all other available data, including Argo and altimetry data, and that the intrinsic impact of TAO/TRITON is larger (Fujii et al , ). Accuracy of the salinity field is not degraded if data from extra‐equatorial buoys outside of 2.5°S–2.5°N are withheld (TTeqA80) in the two regions, although assimilation of extratropical buoys has some impacts on temperature there.…”
Section: Observing System Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the OSE framework, reduction of errors cannot be estimated accurately because the true state is unknown. Instead, errors are evaluated using reference data, which are preferably independent from the data assimilation process performed in advance in the OSEs in order to perform fair evaluation (Fujii et al, 2015b). Adjoint based sensitivity methods are also very applicable for OS-Eval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%