2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the life cycle net benefit of low impact development in a city

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low impact development practices (green roofs and urban green space, porous pavement) have the capacity to reduce urban heat island effects 92 and urban flooding, 93 which would moderate the public health impacts of transportation infrastructure and could be pursued in both old city centers and new towns and suburbs. Key to implementing such urban design policy recommendations will be to have a close institutional coordination among government agencies (appendix).…”
Section: Future Of Healthy Transportation In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low impact development practices (green roofs and urban green space, porous pavement) have the capacity to reduce urban heat island effects 92 and urban flooding, 93 which would moderate the public health impacts of transportation infrastructure and could be pursued in both old city centers and new towns and suburbs. Key to implementing such urban design policy recommendations will be to have a close institutional coordination among government agencies (appendix).…”
Section: Future Of Healthy Transportation In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this valuation methodology is relatively simple, it provides a useful first look at GI's long‐term cost‐benefit projections relative to the capital expense of building new GI sites. Some literature has suggested that the economic value of GI's co‐benefits (e.g., carbon storage and pollutant removal) can offset the costs of construction and ongoing operations and maintenance (O&M) fees associated with GI sites (Clark et al, 2008; Elmqvist et al, 2015; Vandermeulen et al, 2011; Wolf et al, 2014; Zhan & Chui, 2016). However, this modeling effort suggests that is unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings suggest that LCA benefits of the hybrid system are diminished with increasing population density but that LID can be an effective means to reduce water usage in some areas (Jeong et al, 2016). A life-cycle framework considering economic, environmental and social factors was developed by Zhan and Chui (2016) and applied to Hong Kong (China). The 30-year economic and environmental benefits were found to be 5.3 billion USD and 1.2 billion USD, respectively.…”
Section: Planning and Ecosystem Service Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%