2016
DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2015.1115539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Long-Term Effects of Prisoner Reentry Services on Recidivism: What Types of Services Matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
72
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, and even though the SVORI program measures were mostly nonsignificant, it is possible that the program may have played a suppressed role in substance abuse and criminal offending. Yet, given that outcomes from follow‐up evaluations demonstrate that SVORI participation has a minor long‐term impact on criminal offending, substance use, and reincarceration (see Lattimore and Visher, ; nonetheless, see Visher, Lattimore, Barrick, and Tueller [] who showed that there may be a longer term SVORI program effect), it is possible that any suppressed effect that the program may have had on our outcomes is modest in magnitude and somewhat short lived.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally, and even though the SVORI program measures were mostly nonsignificant, it is possible that the program may have played a suppressed role in substance abuse and criminal offending. Yet, given that outcomes from follow‐up evaluations demonstrate that SVORI participation has a minor long‐term impact on criminal offending, substance use, and reincarceration (see Lattimore and Visher, ; nonetheless, see Visher, Lattimore, Barrick, and Tueller [] who showed that there may be a longer term SVORI program effect), it is possible that any suppressed effect that the program may have had on our outcomes is modest in magnitude and somewhat short lived.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This measure, length of incarceration, has an overall mean of 370.848 days, a standard deviation of 227.873, and ranges from 20 days to 1362 days. Finally, as the overall goal of SVORI was to examine how enhanced reentry programming and services related to a variety of reentry outcomes (see Visher et al 2017), we include a binary measure capturing SVORI participation. This measure (1 = SVORI program participant, 0 = non-SVORI program participant) has an overall mean of .451 and a standard deviation of .498.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this knowledge coexists alongside findings that one of two people released from US prisons are reincarcerated within three years (Durose, Cooper and Snyder ), that gold‐standard programming to reduce recidivism struggles at scale (Parsons, Weiss and Wei ; Visher et al . ), and that Second Chance Act programmes fall short of creating second opportunities (D'Amico, Geckeler and Kim ). Some scholars have made the uneasy conclusion that prison may increase future criminal behaviour (Cullen, Jonson and Nagin ), and many others have grappled with the uncomfortable reality that the imprisonment of individuals affects families, children, and communities (Clear ; Wakefield and Wildeman ; Western ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%