Evaluating the outcomes associated with an innovative change in a state-level transportation project prioritization process: A case study of Vermont

Novak, David C.; Koliba, Chris; Zia, Asim; Tucker, Matt

doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.021

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 53 publications

(53 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Techniques recommended for prioritization in the literature are goal programming ( [61,62]), the process failure modes and effect analysis (PFMEA) [70], the Likert based criteria weightage method [31], the Monte-Carlo simulation-based data envelopment analysis method (DEA) [80], simulation-based models [81], and a resource-constrained DEA [15]. Qualitative methods are also recommended, such as the Delphi method or a decision tree method ( [71,82]), a fuzzy quality function deployment (QFD), and the DEA [66], a harmony search algorithm [95]. However, not all methods are applicable to all project situations.…”

Section: Prioritization and Balancingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspectives on the Capabilities for the Selection of Strategic Projects

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Strategic projects are large scale, complex, and require significant investments and resources. These projects aim at gaining long-term social and economic benefits. Therefore, organizations focusing on strategic projects should use a consistent approach that suits their strategy, capability, and long-term expectations. Based on the four research questions and content analysis of the literature, generic processes used for the strategic project selection in tandem with the managerial capabilities are identified in this paper. The generic processes and managerial capabilities are used to develop a generic framework for strategic project selection. The framework is used for literature analysis in the paper. The review shows that both qualitative and quantitative methods are used for strategic project selection. Some possible research directions have also been proposed at the end of the review. The paper provides value to both researchers and practitioners in terms of tools available and a guidance on project selection through a structured process framework.

show abstract

Section: Prioritization and Balancingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspectives on the Capabilities for the Selection of Strategic Projects

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this study, the process of prioritizing projects before and after multi-criteria analysis for the state of Vermont in the USA was presented, and transportation projects were prioritized using a hybrid approach. Novak and his team developed their method considering criteria such as 1) clarifying the prioritization and project implementation process; 2) improving the project prioritization process by integrating objective evaluation criteria into the decision-making process; and 3) reducing inequities in budget allocation for transportation projects (Novak et al 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation Model for Equipping Urban Regions with Intelligent Transportation Based on the Combination of Euclidean and Manhattan Distances

Dorji,

Rafsanjani,

AsadAmraji

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, the stratification of transportation has led to an enhancement of efficiency and a reduction in traffic and transportation issues. Intelligent transportation requires smart systems and equipment. This study presents a novel method for evaluating intelligent transportation systems (ITS) in urban regions. It emphasizes the necessity of assessing ITS quality and quantity in cities to determine the effectiveness in different urban regions. The research adopts a mixed-method approach to devise an evaluation model, focusing on five urban regions of Tehran (regions 3, 4, 12, 10, and 22). Thirteen indicators were selected to assess ITS development through multi-criteria decision-making methods, combining Shannon Entropy and best-worst methods to measure criteria effectively. Data were gathered via a questionnaire targeted at urban planning and transportation experts, producing 70 valid responses from an online survey. The evaluation employed the CODAS method, recognized for its robust control features. Results identified "The number of intelligent central control systems for traffic lights at intersections" as the pivotal indicator, with region 4 of Tehran scoring the highest. These findings provide crucial insights for scholars and policymakers, enhancing understanding of ITS evaluation and supporting budget allocations for such systems. The research's innovation lies in its unique approach to ITS assessment, integrating both quantitative data and expert opinions, which establishes a comprehensive framework for future evaluations in urban transportation planning. This contributes significantly to the academic and practical realms of transportation engineering, offering a strategic perspective on the deployment and enhancement of intelligent transportation frameworks in urban regions.

show abstract

“…Although these policies were designed to improve transportation investment decisions in the long run (see the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act), agencies across the country have recently been challenged to address the new federal standards while managing existing public demand and financial constraints. In asset management, these enhanced reporting and tracking requirements have increased the need for better maintenance prioritization systems (1).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Relating Public Opinions of Roadway Assets to Field Data with Survey and Focus Groups

Davis

Cunningham

Findley

et al. 2017

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation R

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, transportation policy in the United States has increasingly focused on measuring and tracking performance outcomes. However, identifying how quantifiable outcomes—such as international roughness index ratings—influence less tangible outcomes—such as user satisfaction with a roadway—can be challenging. This paper outlines a method that enables researchers to compare stakeholder perceptions of assets with actual field-measured data for roadways. More than 350 residents in six locations in the state of North Carolina were surveyed about how those residents perceived and prioritized the roadway assets managed by the North Carolina Department of Transportation. Using a method termed “roadway reviews,” researchers asked participants about state-maintained roads as the participants were driven on those roads in real time; these surveys were supplemented with focus groups. In addition to identifying how well asset conditions on roadway segments aligned with the basic expectations of roadway users, researchers determined how these ratings compared with field measurements for the segments and captured how participants ranked the importance of specific roadway assets for overall condition, safety, and appearance. The findings will be used to improve asset management practice and will be integrated into the North Carolina Department of Transportation’s annual Highway Performance Monitoring System reports.

show abstract

Evaluating the outcomes associated with an innovative change in a state-level transportation project prioritization process: A case study of Vermont

Cited by 9 publications

References 53 publications

Perspectives on the Capabilities for the Selection of Strategic Projects

Perspectives on the Capabilities for the Selection of Strategic Projects

Evaluation Model for Equipping Urban Regions with Intelligent Transportation Based on the Combination of Euclidean and Manhattan Distances

Relating Public Opinions of Roadway Assets to Field Data with Survey and Focus Groups

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About