2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40808-021-01347-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the performance of MIKE NAM model on rainfall–runoff in lower Gangetic floodplain, West Bengal, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the research, the deterministic, lumped and conceptual rainfall‐runoff model MIKE NAM, initially proposed by Nielsen and Hansen (1973) and currently forming part of the Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI) hydrodynamic platform, was used for the simulation of the basins' discharges. The model describes, in a simplified quantitative form, the behaviour of the land phase of the hydrological cycle (DHI, 2017), with its applicability to be thoroughly assessed in the literature (e.g., Doulgeris et al, 2011; Ghosh et al, 2022; Hafezparast et al, 2013; Refsgaard & Knudsen, 1996; Tehrani et al, 2021). MIKE NAM is based on four interrelated storage (reservoirs) elements, with each storage representing at catchment scale the (i) snow storage, (ii) surface storage, (iii) lower or root zone storage, and (iv) groundwater storage respectively (DHI, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the research, the deterministic, lumped and conceptual rainfall‐runoff model MIKE NAM, initially proposed by Nielsen and Hansen (1973) and currently forming part of the Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI) hydrodynamic platform, was used for the simulation of the basins' discharges. The model describes, in a simplified quantitative form, the behaviour of the land phase of the hydrological cycle (DHI, 2017), with its applicability to be thoroughly assessed in the literature (e.g., Doulgeris et al, 2011; Ghosh et al, 2022; Hafezparast et al, 2013; Refsgaard & Knudsen, 1996; Tehrani et al, 2021). MIKE NAM is based on four interrelated storage (reservoirs) elements, with each storage representing at catchment scale the (i) snow storage, (ii) surface storage, (iii) lower or root zone storage, and (iv) groundwater storage respectively (DHI, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of (Aredo et al, 2021), the rainfall-runoff modeling was carried out using MIKE 11 NAM model at the Shaya catchment in Ethiopia, and the results revealed that there is a very good agreement between the observed and computed runoff [18]. Also, (Ghosh et al, 2022) use the MIKE NAM model in the MIKE HYDRO RIVER environment to integrate rainfall-runoff analysis with the hydrodynamic condition through the food region encompassing the Bhagirathi-Hooghly River, and the calibrated result creates a fairly good relationship with the simulated data [19]. And (Shamsudin and Hashim 2022) used MIKE11 NAM model for the estimation of rainfall runoff in Layang river; the reliability of MIKE11 NAM was evaluated based on the Efficiency Index (EI) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The comparison between the results was made by using root mean square error (RMSE), which is defined as Eq. ( 1) [19]:…”
Section: Fig 2 Structure Of Model Mike Nammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the realm of evaluating the water potential and load-bearing capacity of rivers, numerous studies have been conducted employing diverse models, ranging from basic mathematical models coupled with quantitative descriptive analysis techniques [3] to comprehensive models that incorporate rainfall-flow analysis and hydrodynamic conditions, such as MIKE and QUAL2E [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. In the case of salinized rivers, the prevalence of tidal influence and the influx of water from upstream contribute to the formation of water borders.…”
Section: Research Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%