2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.100993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the performance of polystyrene sulfonate coupling with non ionic Triton-X114 surfactant as draw solution in forward osmosis and membrane distillation systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,17 Among them, polyelectrolyte solution can provide high osmotic pressure similar to salt solution and could be recovered by various means. The FO performance of many polyelectrolyte solutions has been explored in detail, including poly(sodium acrylate) (PAA-Na), 12 polyacrylamide (PAM), 18 poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS), 19 poly N-isopropyl poly(aspartic acid sodium salt) (PAspNa), 20 poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), 21 poly-(ethylenimine) (PEI), and so on. 22,23 Among these studies, polyelectrolytes with different molecular weights and func-tional groups endowed them with varied water flux of 1.0 to 12 LMH, when using DI water as feed and testing with the CTA FO membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16,17 Among them, polyelectrolyte solution can provide high osmotic pressure similar to salt solution and could be recovered by various means. The FO performance of many polyelectrolyte solutions has been explored in detail, including poly(sodium acrylate) (PAA-Na), 12 polyacrylamide (PAM), 18 poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS), 19 poly N-isopropyl poly(aspartic acid sodium salt) (PAspNa), 20 poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), 21 poly-(ethylenimine) (PEI), and so on. 22,23 Among these studies, polyelectrolytes with different molecular weights and func-tional groups endowed them with varied water flux of 1.0 to 12 LMH, when using DI water as feed and testing with the CTA FO membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of materials have been studied as forward osmosis draw solute, such as salts, glucose, , polyelectrolyte, , hydrophilic particles, , and hydrogel. , Among them, polyelectrolyte solution can provide high osmotic pressure similar to salt solution and could be recovered by various means. The FO performance of many polyelectrolyte solutions has been explored in detail, including poly­(sodium acrylate) (PAA-Na), polyacrylamide (PAM), poly­(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS), poly N -isopropyl poly­(aspartic acid sodium salt) (PAspNa), poly­(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly­(ethylenimine) (PEI), and so on. , Among these studies, polyelectrolytes with different molecular weights and functional groups endowed them with varied water flux of 1.0 to 12 LMH, when using DI water as feed and testing with the CTA FO membrane. The physicochemical property of polyelectrolyte solutions has a great effect on their FO water flux; thus, it is of theoretical and practical importance to explore their relationship for the selection of efficient polyelectrolyte draw solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the charge of the groups on the hydrophilic head, surfactants are mainly categorized as anionic, cationic, nonionic, and zwitterionic 9 . The hydrophilic part can improve the interaction with an aqueous phase, while the hydrophobic fragment can interact with a relatively hydrophobic membrane to create a hydrophobic layer on the membrane surface that avoids salt transmission, and therefore decreasing reverse solute flux 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various micellar draw solutions have been recently developed due to their unique features which affect the FO performance 10 , 15 , 16 . Among the different surfactants used as draw solutions, nonionic surfactants have not been investigated probably due to their low osmotic pressure and consequently low water flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid growth of human population, urbanization,​ and industrialization have stimulated the over-extraction of water from the freshwater sources (e.g., river, lakes) for various purposes of the daily demands of water ( Mishra et al, 2016 , Misaghi et al, 2017 ). Moreover, the untreated waste water containing organic and inorganic compounds are generated from the domestic households, industries, agricultural runoffs, and are being discharged in the surrounding water bodies ( Sharma et al, 2016 , Cao et al, 2020 ) resulting in deterioration of water quality (WQ). The shortage of freshwater availability and deterioration of WQ has assisted in extinction of biotic communities and put excess pressure on ecology leading to disturbing the ecosystem ( Singh et al, 2019 , Singh et al, 2020a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%