2015
DOI: 10.1101/028647
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the performance of selection scans to detect selective sweeps in domestic dogs

Abstract: Selective breeding of dogs has resulted in repeated artificial selection on breed-specific morphological phenotypes. A number of quantitative trait loci associated with these phenotypes have been identified in genetic mapping studies. We analyzed the population genomic signatures observed around the causal mutations for 12 of these loci in 25 dog breeds, for which we genotyped 25 individuals in each breed. By measuring the population frequencies of the causal mutations in each breed, we identified those breeds… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…nS L , a modification of iHS, obviates the need for a genetic map, reduces its dependence on recombination and demographic events, and may afford increased sensitivity to detect soft selective sweeps (23). This statistic has proved sensitive in identifying selection in other nonmodel organisms (90). As a secondary test, we constructed recombination maps using LDhat interval and performed the iHS haplotypebased test for directional selection (91,92).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nS L , a modification of iHS, obviates the need for a genetic map, reduces its dependence on recombination and demographic events, and may afford increased sensitivity to detect soft selective sweeps (23). This statistic has proved sensitive in identifying selection in other nonmodel organisms (90). As a secondary test, we constructed recombination maps using LDhat interval and performed the iHS haplotypebased test for directional selection (91,92).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the DARC promoter region has the fewest SNPs in African populations, it has more pairwise differences likely due to two divergent FY Ã O haplotypes in these populations. To further investigate the underlying characteristics that prevents detecting this locus as non-neutral in genome-wide scans of selection, we analyzed statistics from three main classes of selection scans: population differentiation (F ST ), site frequency spectrum (Sweepfinder [52,53]), and linkage disequilibrium (H-scan [54] Tables). For example, using Sweepfinder, a method designed to detect recently completed hard selective sweeps based on the site frequency spectrum, the region is in the 97th percentile (corresponding to P-value = 0.032 in Table 1) genome-wide in African populations.…”
Section: Evidence Of Selection In Darcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed methods in three main categories of selection detection: population differentiation (F ST ), site frequency spectra (Sweepfinder [52,53]), and linkage disequilibrium (H-scan [54]). Genomic regions that have undergone a recent hard selective sweep are expected to have site frequency spectrums skewed toward rare and high frequency derived variants, increased homozygosity and, if local adaptation, high population differentiation.…”
Section: Population Structure Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, soft sweeps, in which the ultimate fixation of an allele is caused by selection acting on more than one copy of that allele (Hermisson and Pennings 2005; also figure 1 of Messer and Petrov 2013), may also occur due to multiple advantageous mutations occurring at a single locus, a scenario we do not explore. Various factors contribute to the relative frequency of different types of selective sweep (Messer and Petrov 2013); both explicitly hard and soft sweeps have been inferred from genetic data (e.g., Peter et al 2012;Garud et al 2015;Schlamp et al 2016).More broadly, the frequency at which selective sweeps occurred in recent human evolution remains a subject of debate (Hernandez et al 2011;Enard et al 2014). Some signals may be driven by other selective processes that are known to have affected human genetic variation, in particular purifying (e.g., Bustamante et al 2005) and balancing (e.g., AndrĂ©s et al 2009) selection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%