“…It is worth emphasizing, as stated in the previous sections, that interpretation of controversial data on HPI–OP/OF relationships should take into account the methodological weaknesses most of the available studies (the vast majority were cross-sectional). The conflicting results are likely due not only to differences in design, sample sizes, protocol and methodologies of determination HPI (often limited to seroprevalence only) as well as OP (T-score BMD method underestimates the OF risk in 56–82% [ 746 , 747 , 748 , 749 , 750 ]), but also—and more importantly—very limited information on specific microbiological characteristics of H.p., ignoring predominant site and severity of gastritis, heterogeneity in patient populations (wide variations in demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, dietary and environmental confounding factors, comorbidities, risk of falling, used medications), However, despite these limitations, the huge number of publications reporting significant links between HPI, particularly with virulent strains (cagA+), and the development, course and severity of different chronic gastroduodenal and extra-digestive diseases and disorders known to be associated with falls, OP and, consequently, OFs cannot be ignored. The topic requires reconsideration in well-designed prospective studies examining simultaneously the virulence factors of H.p.…”