2021
DOI: 10.1080/17502977.2021.1958292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Pitfalls of External Statebuilding in Post-2003 Iraq (2003–2021)

Abstract: Peacebuilding and transitional justice are viewed as integral components of statebuilding in post-conflict spaces. This Special Issue critically evaluates statebuilding and peacebuilding in Iraq through macro and micro-level analyses of Iraq's political development following foreign-imposed regime change. In line with the articles in the Special Issue, this introduction critically examines Iraq's post-2003 trajectory as an outcome of the failure of securitized statebuilding and the absence of legitimacy in ext… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, approaches that seek to broker grand diplomatic bargains among major regional powers, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel, overlook the limitations of the prevalent regional organizations to provide good offices that might reassure or enforce peace agreements. On the other hand, approaches that seek to "fix" failed states by enhancing capacities and improving responsiveness, such as in Iraq after 2003 (Mako & Edgar, 2021), run into even more complex and wicked problems. They are prone to futility and unintended consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, approaches that seek to broker grand diplomatic bargains among major regional powers, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel, overlook the limitations of the prevalent regional organizations to provide good offices that might reassure or enforce peace agreements. On the other hand, approaches that seek to "fix" failed states by enhancing capacities and improving responsiveness, such as in Iraq after 2003 (Mako & Edgar, 2021), run into even more complex and wicked problems. They are prone to futility and unintended consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent work has provided a nuanced approach to the Ba′athist period, highlighting that state‐society relations were shaped by non‐linear and dynamic contestations between the state and other political, religious and intellectual elites (Davis, 2005; Helfont, 2018; Rohde, 2010). Additional research on state‐society relations in Iraq has focused on the political aftermath of the US‐led intervention of 2003, demonstrating the limits of exogenous state building that failed to engage local sites of power and resistance (Dodge, 2013; Mako & Edgar, 2021). This includes studies that document the ways in which local civil society actors and media outlets both shaped and were shaped by state policy after 2003 (Isakhan, 2012, 2021); the complex role that Iraqi women have played in resisting masculinist visions of the state and patriarchal norms (Al‐Ali & Pratt, 2009; Ali, 2018) and the role that key Shia clerics have played in agitating for political reform (Alshamary, 2021).…”
Section: Conceptualising State‐society Relations and Inter‐communal R...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Context of the Situation Extensive research and analysis has focused on Iraq's economic development following the events that took place in 2003, particularly the invasion of Iraq by the United States and the government change that followed (Mako & Edgar, 2021) [37] . Significant political, social, and economic developments happened in the country during this time, which had far-reaching repercussions on the country's growth and stability (Onyeaka et al, 2021) [42] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%