Evaluating the Potential of Index Insurance Schemes to Reduce Crop Yield Risk in an Arid Region

Abstract

We evaluate yield risk reduction through weather index, area yield index and farm yield insurance contracts for wheat farms in Kazakhstan by employing data from 1980 to 2002. We use the usual mean variance (MV) approach and also a second-degree stochastic dominance (SSD) criterion. While MV is not necessarily consistent with the expected utility (EU) theory, SSD results only in a minimum but EU-consistent benefit from insuring. Differences in the estimation results for both approaches underline the advantage of applying both criteria to analyse the risk-reducing potential of crop insurance. Bootstrapping results show that none of the analysed insurance schemes provides statistically significant risk reduction for every single farm. In addition, weather-based index insurance is found to provide less risk reduction than area yield insurance based on the rayon (county) yield. Moreover, rayon yield index insurance can reduce yield risk more effectively for Kazakhstan's wheat producers than farm yield insurance with a low strike yield. Copyright (c) 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation (c) 2008 The Agricultural Economics Society.

The Performance of Index Based Livestock Insurance: Ex Ante Assessment in the Presence of a Poverty Trap

“…Given certain cost and uncertain benefit, the household-specific basis risk with respect to the contract 7 Another approach concentrates on measuring changes in the distribution of the insured outcome based on mean-variance measures, e.g., coefficient of variation, value at risk and downside risk measures (Skees et al 2001;Turvey and Nayak 2003;Vedenov and Barnett 2004). Since that approach ignores the insuree's risk preferences, it may misestimate the benefit of insurance (Fishburn 1977;Breustedt et al 2008).…”

Climate Change, Weather Insurance Design and Hedging Effectiveness

“…25 Then, for a given climate scenario c, yields in a given year i are represented by y c,i and z c,i represents the corresponding realisation of a weather index. The influence of weather on yields under given climatic conditions is captured 22 Barnett and Vedenov (2004); Breustedt et al (2008); Musshoff et al (2009);Berg et al (2009); Leblois and Quirion (2011). 23 Torriani et al (2007a).…”

Agricultural Insurances Based on Meteorological Indices: Realizations, Methods and Research Agenda

“…Both papers also demonstrate the risk of over-fitting the data when the same dataset is used for optimizing the contract parameters and for quantifying the benefits: in several simulations, an IBMI yields a seemingly good outcome when applied to the dataset on which it was optimized, but a much poorer outcome when applied to another dataset for validation. Breustedt et al, 2008 review the tools used for evaluating risk reduction through IBMIs. They note that such downside loss risk measures, as well as the mean-variance criterion, overestimates the benefit of purchasing crop insurance.…”