2019
DOI: 10.2196/11129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Quality of Health Information in a Changing Digital Ecosystem

Abstract: Background Critical evaluation of online health information has always been central to consumer health informatics. However, with the emergence of new Web media platforms and the ubiquity of social media, the issue has taken on a new dimension and urgency. At the same time, many established existing information quality evaluation guidelines address information characteristics other than the content (eg, authority and currency), target information creators rather than users as their main audience, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are other ideas and research topics emerging from the field, some of them not yet published. For example, Keselman and colleagues investigate 'fake health news' spread through the Internet and address the role of scientific literacy in this context (Keselman, Arnott Smith, Murcko, & Kaufman, 2019). A topic that fits with S|E|H in a self-explanatory way is environmental health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other ideas and research topics emerging from the field, some of them not yet published. For example, Keselman and colleagues investigate 'fake health news' spread through the Internet and address the role of scientific literacy in this context (Keselman, Arnott Smith, Murcko, & Kaufman, 2019). A topic that fits with S|E|H in a self-explanatory way is environmental health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these many benefits, there are several considerations that must be recognized when evaluating social media as a means of providing drug and health information. In particular, it should be noted that there is a high degree of variability in the quality, accuracy, completeness, and scholarship of most FOAM content on social media . Some blogs may be entirely opinion‐based, while others may be extensively referenced with updated literature.…”
Section: Additional Considerations For Unique Electronic Resources Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it should be noted that there is a high degree of variability in the quality, accuracy, completeness, and scholarship of most FOAM content on social media. [49][50][51][52][53][54] Some blogs may be entirely opinion-based, while others may be extensively referenced with updated literature. As alluded to above, most FOAM content does not undergo a prospective peer review and, instead, relies on peer review after it has been posted/published.…”
Section: Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The availability of free appraisal tools could help the health information consumer to find trustworthy Web sites. 15 To help patients with PE to find the correct and good quality information on the Web, health-related Web sites should be assessed for quality of health information shown on their pages. The DISCERN questionnaire was developed to assess Web sites and their content in an objective way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%