2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma12060995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Quality Surface Performance of Additive Manufacturing Systems: Methodology and a Material Jetting Case Study

Abstract: The performance characterization of the manufacturing processes for additive manufacturing (AM) systems is a significant task for their standardization and implementation in the industry. Also, there is a large diversity of materials used in different AM processes. In the present paper, a methodology is proposed to evaluate, in different directions, the performance of an AM process and material characterization in terms of surface quality. This methodology consists of eight steps, based on a new surface inspec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface roughness of the mold has been measured using a Namicon TR-220 (Namicon Testing S.R.L., Otopeni, Romania) roughness tester, as per the ISO 4288 standard [ 49 ]. The roughness was measured perpendicular to the deposition direction, following a measurement procedure similar as in [ 50 ]. As is concluded in [ 51 ] the surface obtained by FDM technology is the surface composed of high peaks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface roughness of the mold has been measured using a Namicon TR-220 (Namicon Testing S.R.L., Otopeni, Romania) roughness tester, as per the ISO 4288 standard [ 49 ]. The roughness was measured perpendicular to the deposition direction, following a measurement procedure similar as in [ 50 ]. As is concluded in [ 51 ] the surface obtained by FDM technology is the surface composed of high peaks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, if a circular model is lying down on the build platform and printed in glossy printing mode, then the surface quality is affected by some errors [41]. The experimental roughness (Ra) values for the PolyJet material jetting process are specified according to the finish type as follows: for matte finish in the range of 0.5-15 μm, and for the glossy finish in the range of 0.5-4 μm [42]. The dimensional accuracy and the quality of the surface of a circular artifact built in standing up position are not significantly influenced by the orientation and positioning on the build platform.…”
Section: Process Specifications Materials Artifact and Manufacturimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confirmatory experiments were then performed based on the manufacturing of panels 2 and 3, in similar conditions as the initial experiment (temperature, humidity, same raw materials), to provide validation for the conclusions drawn during the analysis phase and also to confirm a stable process [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%