2014
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v22n91.2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the recession’s impact on state school finance systems

Abstract: Abstract:The Great Recession's effect on state school finance systems was unlike previous downturns in the early 1990s and early 2000s in that it a) involved a greater loss of taxable income in many states, thus greater loss to state general fund revenues, b) also involved a substantial collapse of housing markets and related reduction or at least leveling of growth of taxable property wealth, c) but also involved a substantive infusion of federal "fiscal stabilization" aid to be used to fill holes in state ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main concerns of advocates, policymakers, academics, and state courts from the 1960s through the 1980s were to (a) reduce the overall variation in per pupil spending across local public school districts and (b) disrupt the extent to which that spending variation was related to differences in taxable property wealth across districts; that is, the goal was to achieve more equal dollar inputs, or nominal spending equity , coupled with fiscal neutrality , or reducing the correlation between local school resources and local property wealth. Although modern goals of providing equal opportunity and achieving educational adequacy are more complex and loftier than mere spending equity or fiscal neutrality, achieving the more basic goals remains relevant and still elusive in many states (Baker, ).…”
Section: How and Why Money Matters In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main concerns of advocates, policymakers, academics, and state courts from the 1960s through the 1980s were to (a) reduce the overall variation in per pupil spending across local public school districts and (b) disrupt the extent to which that spending variation was related to differences in taxable property wealth across districts; that is, the goal was to achieve more equal dollar inputs, or nominal spending equity , coupled with fiscal neutrality , or reducing the correlation between local school resources and local property wealth. Although modern goals of providing equal opportunity and achieving educational adequacy are more complex and loftier than mere spending equity or fiscal neutrality, achieving the more basic goals remains relevant and still elusive in many states (Baker, ).…”
Section: How and Why Money Matters In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final four columns show the same set of results, but for state and local funding rather than expenditures. We note the beginning of the Great Recession following the 2007-2008 school year, because 2008-2009 is the first school year in which the Recession began affecting school district finances (Baker, 2014a;Knight, 2017). The left side of Table 2 shows the results for expenditures per student.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Robin Hood initiative has not been a unique approach in the state. Similar programs have been pursued across the nation (Baker, 2014). Even when research overwhelmingly shows that school funding positively impacts academic performance (Baker, 2012), the relationship between government spending on PK-12 public schools and student achievement has been an endless source of debate among policy makers, educators, and community.…”
Section: Case Narrativementioning
confidence: 95%