2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icalt.2012.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Role of Collaboration Scripts as Group Guiding Tools in Activities of Educational Robotics: Conclusions from Three Case Studies

Abstract: Although educational robotics (ER) is considered an innovative and engaging technology for teaching and learning, certain studies emphasize the lack of a coherent and well elaborated pedagogical framework for its implementation. This work contributes toward the development of such a framework by presenting evidence from three case studies implementing ER activities in the school context. The objective has been to explore the impact of various collaboration scripts when used as tools to guide students' groupwor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, students in K-12 do not naturally know how to collaborate effectively. CSCL in K-12 often incorporates collaboration scripts, which guide students in such important tasks as distributing tasks, balancing group member perspectives, responding to groupmates' articulations, and synthesizing results (Atmatzidou & Demetriadis, 2012;Erkens, Bodemer, & Hoppe, 2016;Kollar, Fischer, & Hesse, 2006). In addition, CSCL has not yet fully considered the different patterns of behavior seen in active and passive students (Kwon, Liu, & Johnson, 2014).…”
Section: Collaborative Learning In Problem-based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, students in K-12 do not naturally know how to collaborate effectively. CSCL in K-12 often incorporates collaboration scripts, which guide students in such important tasks as distributing tasks, balancing group member perspectives, responding to groupmates' articulations, and synthesizing results (Atmatzidou & Demetriadis, 2012;Erkens, Bodemer, & Hoppe, 2016;Kollar, Fischer, & Hesse, 2006). In addition, CSCL has not yet fully considered the different patterns of behavior seen in active and passive students (Kwon, Liu, & Johnson, 2014).…”
Section: Collaborative Learning In Problem-based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also indicates that the skills developed through educational robotics are thinking skills (observation, estimation and manipulation), science process skills/ problem-solving approaches, and social interaction/ teamwork skills. Several studies have also shown that educational robotics provides effective learning opportunities for students in both content areas such as physics, biology, geography, mathematics, science, electronics, and mechanical engineering, and also critical academic skills, such as writing, reading, research, creativity, collaboration, critical thinking, decision making, problem solving, and communication skills [6,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Robotics In Education (Rie)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational robotics activities can draw from the core principles of Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism, Vygostsky's collaborative learning, and Bruner's discovery learning. Many studies indicate that educational activities have a positive effect on the development of critical thinking, problem-solving, and meta-cognitive skills [24], as well as on the learning of core programming contents [25].…”
Section: Educational Robotics As Pedagogic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%