2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the role of market-based instruments in protecting marine ecosystem services in wild-caught fisheries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results may also guide similar efforts in other SIDS nations with equivalent dependencies on small-scale fisheries. Indeed, market-based conservation tools are currently poorly linked to metrics used to assess ecosystem services where such services are intuitively understandable from a human value perspective (Murphy et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results may also guide similar efforts in other SIDS nations with equivalent dependencies on small-scale fisheries. Indeed, market-based conservation tools are currently poorly linked to metrics used to assess ecosystem services where such services are intuitively understandable from a human value perspective (Murphy et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, any incentive system must be equitable, inclusive and avoid undermining, penalising or shaming certain fisher groups or gear types, particularly those without the financial capital to make behavioural and technological changes. If not implemented carefully, conservation policies can lead to unintended negative consequences such as supply chain shortages and increased pressure on sustainable fisheries, both of which are detrimental to local food security (Lewis et al, 2020;Murphy et al, 2021). Some fishers surveyed expressed concerns that a SSI programme would raise the prices of local species too high for local Seychellois, or that the programme would only benefit certain fisher types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on the MSC and other fishery-specific certification schemes have shown, for instance, that the MSC supports an ecosystem approach [7], that evaluators do not interpret the MSC criteria in a consistent way [8], and that the MSC brings improvements in only certain aspects of ecosystem-based sustainability [9,10]. The MSC can reduce over-fishing but cannot totally prevent the certification of over-fished stocks [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first strand adopted a "nature view", focusing on the marine ecosystem itself. Related studies focused mainly on marine resource development and sustainable utilization (Jiang and Li, 2021), Control of carbon emissions from marine activities (Lu et al, 2023), marine ecological and environmental carrying capacity (Wang and Du, 2023), marine environmental resource value measurement (Du and Wang, 2021;Du and Cao, 2022;, ecosystem value (Murphy et al, 2021), marine ecosystem restoration (Xia et al, 2022), ocean ecological compensation mechanisms (Jiang et al, 2019), and comprehensive marine governance (Bakker, 2022;Gacutan et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022). These works mainly focused on the unique biological resources and ecological environment characteristics, or on the current status of the ocean, and proposed effective solutions for the development of marine resources, the restoration of the marine ecological environment, and the comprehensive development and utilization of the ocean from a multidisciplinary perspective, including ecology, management, law, and economics.…”
Section: Connotation and Functional Positioning Of The Mesbmentioning
confidence: 99%