Evaluating the Significance of Criteria Contributing to Decision-Making on Brownfield Land Redevelopment Strategies in Urban Areas

Burinskienė, Marija; Bielinskas, Vytautas; Podviezko, Askoldas; Gurskienė, Virginija; Malienė, Vida

doi:10.3390/su9050759

Cited by 37 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To make a quantitative evaluation of socio-economic objects, we need a comprehensive set of criteria (Podviezko and Ginevicius 2010;Burinskiene et al 2017). We will select criteria for describing the attractiveness and competitiveness of national tax systems, which comprise the following topics:…”

Section: Multiple Criteria Evaluation Of Tax Competition In the Eumentioning

confidence: 99%

Tax Competitiveness of the New EU Member States

Podviezko

Parfenova

Pugachev

2019

JRFM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper investigates tax competitiveness among the EU member countries. The tax competition of countries causes both positive and negative effects on macroeconomic processes such as the effectiveness of government spending, the rationality of supply of externalities, and the length and amplitudes of business cycles. A considerable reduction of corporate tax in the EU is related to increased tax competition after new members entered the EU. Multiple criteria methods were chosen for the quantitative evaluation of EU countries from different regions of the EU. Criteria of evaluation were chosen and structured into a hierarchy. The convergence process of the new members of the EU is reinforced with the increasing tax competitiveness of such countries. Results of the multiple criteria evaluation revealed both the factors that increased the tax competitiveness of new members of the EU, and outlined the factors that hampered such competition.

show abstract

Section: Multiple Criteria Evaluation Of Tax Competition In the Eumentioning

confidence: 99%

Tax Competitiveness of the New EU Member States

Podviezko

Parfenova

Pugachev

2019

JRFM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…where the index k denotes categories; j k is the index of a criterion within the category k. It is easily shown that the sum of all weights of evaluation equals to 100% as well (for every expert), which satisfies the requirement for weights per se. Aiming to obtain consistent estimations with the group of experts, the Delphi technique was chosen [36,56,57]. It is based on the aggregation-disaggregation MCDA (multiple criteria decision-aid) paradigm presented in [58] (Figure 1).…”

Section: Eliciting Weights Of Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Aiming to obtain consistent estimations with the group of experts, the Delphi technique was chosen [36,56,57]. It is based on the aggregation-disaggregation MCDA (multiple criteria decision-aid) paradigm presented in [58] (Figure 1).…”

Section: Eliciting Weights Of Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Eliciting Weights of Significance of Criteria for a Monitoring Model of Performance of SMEs for Successful Insolvency Administrator’s Intervention

Podviezko

Kurschus²,

Lapinskienė

2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are accounted for as a major part of the economy of the EU in terms of part of the population employed, turnover, value-added, etc. Causes of insolvency of SMEs can be different; they are categorized in the paper. A considerable shift from resolving cases of bankruptcy with the sole aim to satisfy creditors’ rights to augmenting and enhancing liquidation and reorganization procedures evolved interest of the authors in creating efficient bankruptcy prediction models and, in particular, methodologies for evaluation and monitoring of the performance of SMEs. In the paper, we reviewed several initiatives and instruments created by the EU for supporting SMEs. The paper laid a foundation for creating a more comprehensive methodology for evaluation of the state of a firm undergoing the process of reorganization. A hierarchy structure of criteria for the evaluation of SMEs was used in the paper; methodologies for eliciting weights of importance of criteria from experts and gauging the level of concordance of opinions of experts were applied. Resulting weights of criteria of performance of an insolvent SME were obtained; the importance of the managerial category of criteria was revealed. Prominent features of hierarchy structures and methodology of using the structure for calculating ultimate weights were described and demonstrated. Gauging concordance of opinions of experts revealed a satisfactory level of concordance of opinions of experts; this allowed to prepare the ultimate weights of criteria for multiple criteria evaluation of SMEs for further research.

show abstract

“…As we found eight sets of equal ranks within expert estimates, we use the adjusted formula for calculating Kendall's variable [23] (5):…”

Section: Eliciting Of Weights Of Criteria and Gauging The Level Of Comentioning

confidence: 99%

Decision-Aiding Evaluation of Public Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles in Cities and Resorts of Lithuania

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:In the National Communication Development of [2014][2015][2016][2017][2018][2019][2020][2021][2022] Program and Guidelines of the Development of the Public Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure confirmed by the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, it is planned that, until the year of 2025, among newly registered vehicles, electric ones should make at least 10%. Analysis of the trend of electric vehicles makes evident that the target does not have a real chance to be achieved without targeted efforts. In order to improve the infrastructure of electric vehicles in major cities and resorts of Lithuania, we have carried out a comparative analysis of public infrastructure for electric vehicles in 18 Lithuanian cities and resorts. For the quantitative analysis, we proposed eight criteria describing such an infrastructure. As perception of the infrastructure by owners of electric cars depends on complex factors, we used multiple criteria evaluation methods (MCDM) for evaluation of the current state of its development by four such methods: EDAS, SAW, TOPSIS, and PROMETHEE II. Based on the evaluation results, prominent and lagging factors were understood, and proposals for effective development of public infrastructure of electric vehicles were proposed for improvement of the infrastructure.

show abstract

Evaluating the Significance of Criteria Contributing to Decision-Making on Brownfield Land Redevelopment Strategies in Urban Areas

Cited by 37 publications

References 54 publications

Tax Competitiveness of the New EU Member States

Tax Competitiveness of the New EU Member States

Eliciting Weights of Significance of Criteria for a Monitoring Model of Performance of SMEs for Successful Insolvency Administrator’s Intervention

Decision-Aiding Evaluation of Public Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles in Cities and Resorts of Lithuania

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About