Evaluating the success of the tele-pathology system in governmental hospitals in Kuwait: an explanatory sequential mixed methods design

Abstract

Background Telepathology is the practice of reviewing and exchanging pathological images through telecommunication systems to obtain diagnoses remotely. Studying the factors that make such a system successful and favourable is important to ensure the merits of its implementation in clinical practice. Objective This study aims to evaluate the success of a telepathology system from the users’ perspectives, using specific evaluation criteria, namely: system quality, information quality, technical service quality, user satisfaction, and benefits. Methods A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was adopted in this study, which consists of two phases. Initially, a questionnaire was distributed via WhatsApp to all of the pathologists (total: 45) working at governmental hospitals in Kuwait. Followed by, semi-structured interviews with ten senior pathologists. Results Forty pathologists responded to the questionnaire, giving an 89% response rate. There were 42.5% of the respondents aged between 35–44 years old, and 52.5% were male. The quantitative results reveal that most of the respondents were satisfied with the quality of the telepathology system with a mean of 2.6025 (Standard Deviation (SD) = 0.47176), whereas they were dissatisfied with the quality of the information with a mean of 2.4100 (SD = 1.580) and the technical support services with a mean of 2.2750 (SD = 0.99535). In addition, there was disagreement on the benefits of telepathology in clinical practice among the pathologists with a mean of 2.4667 (SD = 0.77552). The qualitative results indicate that the lack of interest in and little experience with using the system were behind the general dissatisfaction of most of the respondents. All of the interviewees were satisfied with the performance of the telepathology system and considered it successful; however, the quality of the technical support services, including training workshops, was deemed deficient. Conclusion This study concluded that telepathology system in Kuwait is functioning well and has been successful in its implementation; however, pathologists are dissatisfied with it, mainly due to the deficient quality of the technical support services provided. In addition, the successful implementation of such advanced technologies requires careful steps to be taken on multiple levels: technical, organisational, and managerial. Recommendations were suggested.

WhatsApp-Based Record-Keeping System in a Private Neurosurgical Clinic Chain

“…WhatsApp can offer a cost-effective, user-friendly, and efficient communication option in neurosurgical practice [ 4 , 5 ]. It proved to be useful for professional communication in different medical disciplines such as ophthalmology [ 6 ], emergency medicine [ 7 ], radiology [ 8 ], dermatology [ 9 ], orthopedics [ 10 ], pathology [ 11 ], and burn care [ 12 ]. WhatsApp facilitates physician-physician communication [ 13 ], improves medical care [ 14 ], and enhances decision-making [ 15 ].…”

Examining perceptions of a telemedicine network for pediatric emergency medicine: a mixed-methods pilot study

“…The study employed a sequential explanatory mixedmethods design, in which the quantitative data were collected first to inform the design of qualitative inquiry (4). A similar approach has been used elsewhere for health technology assessment and was relevant to address the research questions for study (5)(6)(7).…”

Computational pathology: A survey review and the way forward

“…Some pathologists consider the analysis of WSIs as opposed to glass slides as an unnecessary change in their workflow 9 , 18 , 19 , 20 and recent surveys indicate that the switch to digital pathology does not provide enough financial incentive. 8 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 This is where advances from CPath can address or overpower many of the concerns in adopting a digital workflow. For example, CPath models to identify morphological features that correlate with breast cancer 26 provide substantial benefits to clinical accuracy.…”